Image © Amateur Photographer Magazine, IPC Media.
22 Jun 2010
Your street photography rights on a lens cloth
We don't always talk about what other photography magazines are doing, but we'll make an exception for Amateur Photographer's latest initiative in its ongoing campaign for photographers' rights
Olivier Laurent
In the 10 July issue of Amateur Photographer, UK readers will find a lens cloth to carry around. Nothing particularly new here, magazines have often offered such gifts. But this time, Amateur Photographer has printed on the lens cloth a short letter to all police officers advising them about street photography rights.
"Despite government assurances to AP, photographers are needlessly prevented from taking pictures in public everyday," says AP's editor Damien Demolder. "But with our Photographer's Rights lens cloth you'll be able to quickly and politely point out what your rights are. So long as you are on public property this should make your day a whole lot better – and it will keep your lens clean too."
The letter is based on guidelines issued last year by the Metropolitan Police to help officers deal with amateur and professional photographers taking pictures in public places. They were issued after photographers, assisted by Amateur Photographer's and BJP's campaigns to protect street photography rights, protested the use of Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to stop and seach photographers.
These stop-and-search powers have now been found to be illegal, according to the European Court of Human Rights.
To find out more about Amateur Photographer's lens cloth, visit amateurphotographer.co.uk.
Comments
I wish there was more advocacy against the diminishing rights of photographers, like this.
In a recent episode of This Week in Photography, there was discussion about the requirement "That all parties must agree to be documented", which some states have passed into law and are enforcing.
Any idea about weather this "Notice of Photography Rights" works with or contradict these state laws?
Many COPS do not care, They will bully you into what that want, or they will find a way to lock you up.
IT will cost you money to get out of the situation if you are arrested.
Its always good to have a witness.
Its a very SAD state of affairs.
It is most important when venturing out with your camera to ensure that you have nothing at all on you with your name and address on. I am not the only one to notice that when PC Plod stops you, the only thing he/she is interested in is your name/address and date of birth. You are not obliged to provide this and I strongly advise against giving it. On an enhanced police records check, you do not want it to show: "stopped on suspicion of taking photographs of children or for terrorist purposes." Such would prevent you from even getting a voluntary job, i.e. a charity shop. If the officer tells you that you must tell him who you are, remind hime of PACE section 3 subsection 3.This is why I ensure that I have nothing on me. If you are arrested and locked in a cell, you will have grounds to sue - the going rate is £5,000. If a police officer approaches you and claims that a complaint has been made by "a concerned member of the public" and that he is bound to investigate, put this question to him: 'What criminl offence am I suspected of committing to warrant police involvement?' This always throws them. Remember, there is no offence known to law as 'acting suspiciously.
The lens cloth letter is a brilliant idea but so is the comment by Dave Murray.
The question I ask why is the BFP not more supportive and issue some kind of useful plausable ID card that show you are a serious photographer and only a photographer.
The blue cardboard with a sticky lable, looks so amateurish and could have been printed on a home printer.
It's time that the BFP steps up its image and its support for Freelancers
to wipe away all tears from your eyes
There are does and donts about this process. Don't photograph families when their kids are doing GCSEs. Don't even go out with a camera if the media are pressing the pedophile button. DONT imagine that people do not have a right to complain about their portrayal in published images. They do. So do you. But they can of course, simply turn their backs to you- works every time.
The police, bless 'em, unfortunately being members of the public, DUH, also are prone to equal levels of paranoia which they share with their fellows. Remember it was the mob who had Christ killed and Barabbas released. It was the mob who fought WW1 and WW2 and Vietnam and the Gulf Wars, not the politicians, or the lawyers. In the street you are another tourist, another member of the public, first, and a photographer a long way second, as, believe it or not, the vast majority of suffering humanity don't give a monkeys about photographs really, except as snaps of their families and their friends.
Only other photographers, and the odd editor and picture editor and museum curator care at all, so stop acting the martyr every time someone does take umbrage at your presence.
Blog roll
- 5b4
- 1000 Words Photography
- A Photo Editor
- A Visual Society
- BagNews
- BagNews (on Tumblr)
- Boston Globe's The Big Picture
- Conscientious
- Conscientious Redux (on Tumblr)
- Duckrabbit
- Foto8
- Food For Your Eyes
- Gawker
- Getty Images' Blog
- Here
- Hotshoe
- Institute for Artist Management
- Invisible Ph t grapher Asia
- Journalism.co.uk
- Lens at The New York Times
- Lens Culture
- Lightstalkers
- Los Angeles Times Photography
- Mastering Multimedia
- Mostly True
- No Caption Needed
- PDN Pulse
- Photo Magazine (France)
- Photojournalismlinks
- Prison Photography
- Prison Photography (on Tumblr)
- Resolve - The liveBooks Photo Blog
- Romenesko
- Rob Galbraith DPI
- Saatchi Online
- StockPhotoTalk
- Telephoto
- The 37th Frame
- The Big Picture
- The Daily Nice
- The Click
- The Online Photographer
- The Russian Photos Blog
- The Travel Photographer
- Vice Magazine
- Wall Street Journal's Photo Blog
- WarShooter
- What's the jackanory?

















