What's next? The BJP wants your thoughts on the future of photography, before Foam's invite-only discussion on 19 March
19 Mar 2011
"Every image functions within a political and economic system"
Images can't challenge power because they're made within certain systems, says Adam Broomberg at the What's Next symposium. What's important is that you look at the system
Diane Smyth
He and Oliver Chanarin used their address to outline their work on war imagery, from their recent project, People in Trouble, which considers an archive of images taken in Belfast at the height of the Troubles, to their current work in progress, War Primer Two, which gathers images of war from the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America on. In the panel discussion that followed, Broomberg expanded on the thinking behind this work.
"For me, the most important thing is the knowledge produced," he said. "The image cannot challenge power because every image functions within a political and economic system. It's important to ignore the image and look at the system. For example, war photography is created by a negotiation between editorial and advertising [in publishing] and they determine what we see in war."
Later he added, "Press images are often selected on the immediate emotional empathy they will create but that makes a critical perspective impossible. I went to a conference the day after the Neda video was shot [an amateur video showing a young woman being killed at the Iranian protests in 2009]. Thomas Keenan [who teaches at the Bard College] showed two different versions, one with music the other with a translation of the sound recording, and people in the audience had an emotional response, but Thomas was adamant we needed to consider how the images were working. That was a big lesson for me."
Comments
I was for several years a london photojournalist. I covered hundreds of pickets and demonstrations, several factory occupations and enormous amounts of avant-garde music and theatre as a member of a group of people called Report, many of whom were most definitely politicized in ways beyond my comprehension. All that work, three years of it vanished, stolen by people who imagine quite sincerely that their thefts, not just of my works but those of some 40 others-some household names, is in some way justified as serving a greater purpose- a bit like hackers claim they are doing us a favour now. They wanted it all as a resource, but forgot we owned the copyright and the film, and that our agreement was to its use and not its ownership.
Now, why are such mindsets irrelevant nonsenses? Many very good photographers have committed themselves to recording certain subjects because they too have a political and/or ideological "agenda".
They actually believe, like the character whose quote is used here, that they are making a difference- that they are making us aware, and that this awareness itself and the presence of such images serves to make the planet potentially a better place.
I say no, on a personal level, as my stuff was indistinguishable in quality and subject matter from that of my colleagues, yet I take pictures just for the fun of it, to see what can be got of visual and human interest out of any situation.
I say no on another level because quite simply all recording violence does is raise your personal threshold of violence, and confronting others with such images brutalizes them and raises theirs.
Its why there's a 9pm "adult" threshold on TV.
The concept that there exists "a political and economic system" is itself bull.
You are searching for a needle in haystack to so imagine. Chaos is not a system.
Yes, obviously you can tabulate and reason about all such forces acting in the world.
Yes, obviously you can parade your images of violence and violation for a Pulitzer or for the WPP or whatever IF you subscribe yourself to this system.
But in doing so, it is you who are a party to this system: you are celebrating its existing in recording it at all, and perpetuating it forever through the medium you use.
It is you who have become the system, sentenced as L.Cohen said, "to 20 years of boredom, for trying to change the system from within".
Si tu n'aimes pas le film, tu peux toujours aller a un autre cinema"
If you do not like the film, you can always go to another cinema.
Blog roll
- 5b4
- 1000 Words Photography
- A Photo Editor
- A Visual Society
- BagNews
- BagNews (on Tumblr)
- Boston Globe's The Big Picture
- Conscientious
- Conscientious Redux (on Tumblr)
- Duckrabbit
- Foto8
- Food For Your Eyes
- Gawker
- Getty Images' Blog
- Here
- Hotshoe
- Institute for Artist Management
- Invisible Ph t grapher Asia
- Journalism.co.uk
- Lens at The New York Times
- Lens Culture
- Lightstalkers
- Los Angeles Times Photography
- Mastering Multimedia
- Mostly True
- No Caption Needed
- PDN Pulse
- Photo Magazine (France)
- Photojournalismlinks
- Prison Photography
- Prison Photography (on Tumblr)
- Resolve - The liveBooks Photo Blog
- Romenesko
- Rob Galbraith DPI
- Saatchi Online
- StockPhotoTalk
- Telephoto
- The 37th Frame
- The Big Picture
- The Daily Nice
- The Click
- The Online Photographer
- The Russian Photos Blog
- The Travel Photographer
- Vice Magazine
- Wall Street Journal's Photo Blog
- WarShooter
- What's the jackanory?

















