Sigma's SD1
04 Jul 2011
Hands-on with Sigma's SD1
BJP's technical reviewer Richard Kilpatrick has been testing Sigma's 46-megapixel SD1 digital SLR. Ahead of the publication of his full review in August, he gives us his first impressions
Olivier Laurent
Tags:
Sigma, Medium format cameras, DslrSigma's SD1 - announced at Photokina in 2010, and now shipping worldwide - has already proven to be unusual for the Japanese firm that perseveres with the Foveon X3 technology first adopted with the 2002 SD9.
This professional body brings Sigma's APS-C offering back into play against contemporary DSLRs, with an output file of 15Mp and a solid, professional quality construction. It's reached the market almost within the initial time estimates despite the tragic earthquake in March that affected many manufacturers and individuals, resulting in constrained stock and delays for many products announced at the end of last year; a sharp contrast with the wait for the previous models developed in tandem with Foveon.
The cost estimates are another matter. During Photokina, Sigma's COO Kazuto Yamaki is reputed to have offered an estimate of "a similar price to the 5D Mk II" which many pundits took to be around £1800. When the official pricing was announced, the PR own-goal resulting from an MSRP over 3x these estimates has left photographers baffled. Even Yamaki's Twitter feed has carried unprecedented amounts of humble justification, undermining the bold statement the SD1's launch made; if Sigma were truly confident in the SD1 there would be no need to justify the pricing. In the UK, the SD1's MSRP is £6199 including VAT - typically the street price is a little lower, though this megapixel-packing beast is still competing on price with Leica's M9-P and Nikon's D3X rather than the 5D Mk II or D3s (unless you're considering buying three of the former).
As with the SD9's launch, the SD1 is proving to be controversial whilst eluding any direct comparison; no other company is fielding an APS-C camera remotely close to this price point. Once we've got the system into the studio and out into the field, we'll be able to ascertain if the unique sensor justifies a £4500 price premium; early signs are that the distinctive look of Foveon images has been retained and improved upon with higher ISO and of course, a much greater resolution.
As such, whilst it's clear both from use and the spec that it's not going to be knocking the D3 and 1D systems out of the photojournalist and sports photographer's hands, it could well have a place in fine art and fashion photography; the latter could be swayed by retention of texture and detail in fabrics without the softness of a low pass filter, the false colour moiré of a Bayer without one, or the slow capture process of a multi-shot back. The 7 frame buffer will allow a two second burst at 3.5fps; it's not going to be a camera that can be wildly aimed and fired machine-gun style. Similarly despite the Foveon's undoubted advantages as a sensor for video, the SD1 features no Live View or video capability (not even the miniscule QVGA ability of the DP series) - perhaps because processing the data would require a lot more silicon, space and heat dissipation in that slim body.
Physically, the SD1 is a big improvement over previous Sigma SLRs, both in absolute and relative terms. A complete magnesium alloy shell with good weathersealing incorporates one of the most comfortable grips I have used in a long time - deep, chunky and yet somehow relatively slim, it's the shallow body proportion that makes it possible and reminiscent of a Minolta 7000.
Ergonomically Sigma has taken with one hand and given with the other, as the top-plate LCD disappears to be replaced with a second control wheel and more direct access controls for features like ISO and exposure compensation. The QS button - now a Sigma feature - remains. Disappointingly - though not of any relevance to the image quality - the 3.0 display does not hit the VGA resolution sported by most DSLRs (and many compacts) now. Custom functions make a welcome appearance alongside lens adjustments and the return of UDMA CompactFlash storage.
So far, then, the SD1's physical build is up there with mid-range DSLRs, a good £1300 body more likely to set you back £5700 or so for an otherwise unobtainable image rendering. All the work on the camera, bar the body engineering, has focused on the now in-house X3 chip and pipeline. Such purity comes with a high risk - without distracting features, all attention is focused squarely on that new, unique sensor; however Sigma's biggest hurdle may not be the technology. The quality, price and performance blend of cameras such as the M9 is rarely questioned despite the manual control and relatively low ISO - and the images created often justify the expense for those inclined.
Sigma's brand has been so strongly defined by offering lower cost lenses and the inevitable price cutting of past SD and DP models that no matter how good it is, some photographers are going to find it hard to swallow a Sigma that costs more than any APS-C DSLR.
BJP will present Kilpatrick's full review in its next print issue, out 03 August.

"The 'random objects on a table' studio test shot isn't my usual style, but it proves useful sometimes - even if the random objects are a touch childish."

"The Foveon sensor's unique quality is largely down to the lack of colour interpolation; not only does this mean that if the lens can resolve it, the sensor should see it, it also ensures different objects remain seperate with no adjacent pixels used in calculation of the final image. The fine detail and texture of the bear's paw is retained with the strands in front of the clock's foot clearly distinct. Such detail is rarely retained as clearly by Bayer-pattern cameras; meanwhile the screen print of the Matchbox car box (and cardboard fibres) are clearly visible. The colour reproduction is fantastic with studio lighting."

"A first for a Sigma X3 based DSLR - the Foveon® logo has gone. However, that useful, easily removed IR filter remains, positioning the SD1 as one of the easiest ways to get access to high resolution infra-red photography as well as keeping dust out."

"The SD1 retains the quick-access function introduced with the SD15 as well as the "QS" button first seen on the SD14, giving rapid (and duplicated, in some cases) access to commonly altered settings; despite so many direct buttons the rear panel looks uncluttered in an era of feature-packed cameras. The new upper limit of 6400 ISO is a first for any Sigma camera"

Comments
Now if Sigma had only used the F mount, they could have used some nice Nikkors. As it is, there is a real risk that they won't have lenses with the resolving capability to get the best from the sensor.
Stubborn? No. Overconfidence?...Perhaps.
As a long term Sigma DSLR user I would like to point out that out of the several dozen prime lenses I use, ranging from 14mm up to 1100mm focal length (and that would also be usable on the SD1...If I could afford it!), only one of them is an actual Sigma branded lens. The rest are made by Canon, Nikon, Tamron, Tokina, Carl Zeiss, Carl Zeiss Jena, Pentax, Minolta, Vivitar and more.
So just because the SD1 has an SA mount does'nt mean that your limited to only using Sigma lenses on it.
I had always been wondering why my macro and still life photos did not look sharp when I expanded them to their full size and examined fabrics and materials ...now that this has been explained here I now see why! .This looks like a great camera for still life and macro photography, thanks BJP.
This camera looks like the real deal but at the price tag I will have to mortgage everything to get it !!
Very interesting but out of my money pocket, so i am looking for a SD10 on "b-bay" and i love my DP2, have a look at www.41mm.wordpress.com but anyway i will buy the bjp for the review. All best from Berlin to London ...
SD1 was late as typical Sigma product, it´s insanely overpriced, slow, outdated, with many bugs and dredful software. The resolution exceeds capabilities of Sigma lenses, chromatic aberration is typical for SD1 images. Acceptable low light performance ends at ISO 800. Strange pattern is sometimes present (sky shots), probably as a result of noise reduction. Magenta and green noise splotches is typical Foveon noise, present in shadows over ISO 200-400 (depends on time of exposition - longer=better) and is very difficult to filter it. Dynamic/tonal range is very good - typical for Foveon, now improved in shadows. If you are brave enough to work with it (pain and frustration), you can reach very beautiful images from RAW at low ISO. Resolution is on the same level of Sony A900. It´s no competition for medium format even Kazuto Yamaki wants so.
This camera looks interesting. As someone who shoots mainly architecture, i am not concerned with capabilities for Extremly fast frames per second, and image quality is what i am looking for. I am about to make the jump to a new camera from a Nikon D200 that i have used for many years now.. Really looking forward to increased scope from lenses, and have the D3 in mind... but would be very interested and grateful hearing from other users of this camera who shoot architecture, and information on how compatible this is with Nikon Lenses... contact details on website http://www.tommanleyphotography.com
Blog roll
- 5b4
- 1000 Words Photography
- A Photo Editor
- A Visual Society
- BagNews
- BagNews (on Tumblr)
- Boston Globe's The Big Picture
- Conscientious
- Conscientious Redux (on Tumblr)
- Duckrabbit
- Foto8
- Food For Your Eyes
- Gawker
- Getty Images' Blog
- Here
- Hotshoe
- Institute for Artist Management
- Invisible Ph t grapher Asia
- Journalism.co.uk
- Lens at The New York Times
- Lens Culture
- Lightstalkers
- Los Angeles Times Photography
- Mastering Multimedia
- Mostly True
- No Caption Needed
- PDN Pulse
- Photo Magazine (France)
- Photojournalismlinks
- Prison Photography
- Prison Photography (on Tumblr)
- Resolve - The liveBooks Photo Blog
- Romenesko
- Rob Galbraith DPI
- Saatchi Online
- StockPhotoTalk
- Telephoto
- The 37th Frame
- The Big Picture
- The Daily Nice
- The Click
- The Online Photographer
- The Russian Photos Blog
- The Travel Photographer
- Vice Magazine
- Wall Street Journal's Photo Blog
- WarShooter
- What's the jackanory?

















