Add a new comment:

The integrity of such awards are highly suspect and well done for exposing and supporting Damien Denolder. Consider these 'awards' as Technical Marketing and little else. There is more of this 'puff' published as brick and mortar stores close, reducing the ability to test gear out and draw your own conclusions from facts.

How can give awards based either on Beta hardware or software (CS5 is still beta today) ?

What lessons were learned after launch of EOS 1d Mk3 AF's perfromance ? or new software bugs after its release ? Do these awards not take reliability into consideration ? NOT!

Posted by: John Lamont on 29 Apr 2010 at 12:41

Same as any other year

Well said (about mis-awarding a product that has not been on the market yet). But I do not see the news factor here. It has always been like this, with this award.

Posted by: Marco Venturini-Autieri on 02 Jun 2010 at 16:10

Luv It!

Sounds like the 'Pet Food Industry' at work here!

Posted by: Tella Watermaine on 09 Jun 2010 at 19:18

Updating your subscription status Loading