Add a new comment:
Most Popular Articles
Kodak phases out digital businesses, keeps film alive
Updating your subscription status
About us
BJP is the world’s longest running photography magazine, established in 1854, and online since 1997. A high-quality monthly printed edition is available as a subscription or from selected newsagents in the UK and around the world.
Jobs
Open College of the Arts are looking for new tutors for there highly successful photogrpahy degree programme. These are part time contract roles and tutors work from home.
Stu Williamson Photography looking for an experienced digital retoucher to join its busy studio in Dubai. Experience with portrait retouching a must and you need to be proficient with photoshop.
The Flash centre are looking for an enthusiastic Junior to join their London Sales team.
Knowledge of Photography and an understanding of Lighting would be a benefit...
Popular Topics
While I appreciate the officer in this situation (And a lot of other situations that we're witnessing) is completely out of line, the photographer could have resolved this situation (And nearly every other one) by simply stating 'I'm a hobbyist photographer, I take photos because I enjoy taking photos" or "I'm a photographer, I'm earning a living from taking photographs". Hand over your ID, and be more than pleasant with the police officers involved. If you've got nothing to hide, then it's nothing more than a simple stop and account, a delay of 3 minutes rather than 20 minutes, and you're on your way.
A smile and a brief friendly chat will take you a lot further than telling an officer you're an activist of any kind or refusing to co-operate.
Posted by: Al on 14 Dec 2009 at 11:48
hmm. Overzealous cop meets abrasive photographer. the cop is well within his rights to detain him for the reasons he gives - thing is he's a bit of a spanner so the photographer goads him into nicking him by being difficult. He could have been out of there in 30 seconds had he not wanted to wind the cop up for the benefit of his microphone
Posted by: Ralph on 14 Dec 2009 at 11:58
Yes, the tog could have been a little less 'full on', but it does illustrate a point that we need as photographers to address:
There is no reason at all why we should have to justify our taking of pictures in a public space.
The sad thing is that, before we know it, us photographers will be hounded at every turn by Daily Mail reading imbeciles who see paedophiles and terrorists around every corner.
Posted by: Alex Suffolk Photographer on 06 Jan 2010 at 11:51