US Homeland Security deparment settles photography rights case

Quids-in

As a few 'togs in this country have found out, being arrested for using a camera in a public place can result in thousands of pounds compensation. Am I the only one who has noticed that the only thing police officers are remotely interested in is obtaining your name and address/date of birth? That was so in my case and I have noticed that on at least two other occasions, men have been arrested for declining to provide their personal details. Only released when they relent and give them. As the law allows us to withhold these: (PACE S3 (3), an arrest and detention in the cells will, ultimately, result in a cash payout. Me? I'm looking forward to the next approach. It is vital to ensure that you have nothing on your person with these details on. As search will reveal your details and negate your refusal. Coppers have been known to comment that a search usually produces some form of ID!

Staying Silent

"While the settlement will benefit photographers working around federal buildings, the deal also specifies that officers are allowed to ask the name of the photographer and the purpose of his pictures. The officers are also allowed to take any "lawful steps to ascertain whether unlawful activity, or reconnaissance for the purpose of a terrorist or unlawful act, is being undertaken," according to the Washington Post.

So basically this whole song and dance is going to continue SOP—photographers will still be harassed and unlawfully arrested, causing tax payers money.

It's important to note though, that photographers/people do not have to answer any officer's questions when approached, especially during a consensual conversation.

Just ask if you're being detained and if the cop says "no" ignore the officer and continue taking pictures, or walk away.

However, if you are detained each state has different stop and ID laws, so you should research them to know what you can and can not do during a detain regarding your identity.