Add a new comment:

looks nice...

Looks a lot like the old Panasonic LC1/L1 cross-bred with a GF1, which isn't a bad thing.

Posted by: Matt on 07 Nov 2011 at 10:10

Lenses

Whilst the camera is great, what is also required from one or other of the micro 4/3rds stables is a range of large aperture lenses. The Olympus 45mm f1.8 is tremendous, but more like it are needed.

Posted by: Gerry Walden on 07 Nov 2011 at 11:13

viewfinder

still looks like they haven't put a real viewfinder in it.

Posted by: jeff moore on 07 Nov 2011 at 14:54

Stylish!

There is only one word to describe that camera "Ugly".

Who do they think that camera will appeal to?

Posted by: Paul Reading on 08 Nov 2011 at 06:03

Nice except for that EVF

I've used other Panasonics with great success, especially the GH-2 for video and FT2 for underwater and general survivability.

I question the value of loading a little camera like the GX-1 with a top-heavy EVF though, and would rather have this built-in or not bother.

For looks, I'd take the gunmetal-finish option.

Posted by: DJ on 09 Nov 2011 at 16:10

yes, stylish

Paul Reading is contemptuous of the GX1's styling and asks who the camera will appeal to. The short answer is me and many others like me. Of course, I would prefer a built-in VF but the body, like its predecessor has great style. It also happens to take good photos and doesn't break your shoulder lugging it around.

Posted by: John Ellis on 11 Nov 2011 at 19:04

Updating your subscription status Loading