Add a new comment:
Most Popular Articles
12 photographers selected for 2013 World Press Photo's Joop Swart Masterclass
Updating your subscription status
About us

British Journal of Photography is the world’s longest running photography magazine, established in 1854, and online since 1997. A high-quality monthly printed edition is available as a subscription or from selected newsagents in the UK and around the world.
Jobs
We have a vacancy for a Key Account Manager working on The British Journal of Photography
Magnet Harlequin, one of the UK's leading Creative Production Agencies is seeking a new Head of Photography.
We have opportunities for two experienced photographic, audio or video technicians.
Popular Topics
Copyright across the omage, big letters
All the more reason to splash a big fat copyright notice or email address right over any photo that could be construed as newsworthy. That way, no excuses. If an agency If a news agency tries to 'shop it out for publication, that's a very deliberate action. If they say "could not contact" well that is a load of rubbish. A lot of people who take and immediately upload stuff like this live on their devices. And if it comes from Instagram. Twitter - there are comment fields on IG and Direct message on Twitter. To say "we could not contact" holds no water.
Posted by: Libby Stack on 21 Jan 2013 at 20:40
Good for Jenner..
Good for Jenner
"Sure, it's ok you used it, but I want 5000 quid for it".
win-win ?
Posted by: John on 22 Jan 2013 at 08:11
Better late than never, they did it with me too...
It is a pity see a newspaper do this kind of "smart" decisions. They had done the same with one of my twitter's pictures, publishing without my authorisation. I informed myself with lawyers and the compensation didn't justified a legal action. It is a fight of the big against the small with a traditional winner. Moreover, as my picture was used without my authorisation more than a year ago this unquestionably is a current practice on Evening Standard, meaning that the "heat of the moment" decision can not so "heat" as they have done it before and have a lot of time to think about!
Shame on you unethical newspapers!
Posted by: Fj on 22 Jan 2013 at 10:03
Try that elsewhere
I must try the "Standard defence" in the local supermarket; grab dinner, walk out, eat food - if they want paying I'll be happy to cough my standard rate for dinner of 5p. Irrespective of the legality, what papers like the Standard get away with on a daily basis is morally repugnant, and a legal system that makes such theft unlikely to attract meaningful sanction is not fit for purpose.
Posted by: Mark W on 20 Feb 2013 at 00:44
Take Away
A newspaper claiming it couldn't find a photograph's author before it went to press is the same as me walking out of Currys with a 42" TV because I couldn't find a cashier before the football came on.
Posted by: Steve Holcroft on 22 Feb 2013 at 18:20