Post-processing in the digital age: Photojournalists and 10b Photography

10b-yuri-kozyrev-01

Yuri Kozyrev's iconic image of the Libyan conflict went through the hands of the post-processing lab 10b before it was published to critical acclaim by Time magazine, due, in part, to its tones colours and contrast. Images © Yuri Kozyrev / Noor for Time.

10b Photography has established itself as one of the world’s leading digital darkrooms, handling post-production for scores of award-winning photojournalists who trust that the company knows where to draw the line between processing and manipulation. Olivier Laurent meets the founders.

Author: Olivier Laurent

When Yuri Kozyrev was covering the Arab Spring, working in Bahrain, Egypt, Libya and Yemen for Time, instead of wiring his images direct to the magazine in New York, he sent them first to Claudio Palmisano in Rome, who would process them according to the photographer's specifications, and then forward them to picture editor Patrick Witty. Palmisano is the co-founder of 10b Photography, which has been working with some of the biggest names in photojournalism for the past five years, including Paolo Pellegrin, Finbarr O'Reilly and Marcus Bleasdale, among many others. Their work has appeared in The New York Times, Newsweek and Russian Reporter, and they count among their clients the Nobel Peace Center, Saatchi & Saatchi, Magnum Photos, Noor and VII Photo.

Palmisano, who set up 10b with fellow photographer Francesco Zizola, explains the company's background. "It was 2006 and I had been working as a freelance digital photo editor [alongside photography assignments] for years," he tells BJP. "I had opened a little lab with a friend of mine, though we used to spend more time playing online games than post-producing images. In the meantime I had started toning images for some renowned photographers. I had worked with Paolo Pellegrin on the portfolio he submitted to Magnum Photos [to become a member], and I had also printed an exhibition by Francesco Zizola."

Zizola, who was looking for the right place to move his Rome-based studio - "I've never been able to leave my hometown," he says - came across "a real-estate bargain". Much bigger than what he was looking for at the time, his new studio was in need of an idea. "I thought it over for some time and I decided that it was worth my while, since it stirred my ambition to interpret the new cultural and technological possibilities arising in the field of photography, especially editorial photography." That's when 10b was born. "I thought of it as a laboratory where new technological, but also ethical and cultural, challenges posed by documentary photography could be experienced and tested," he explains. "I had in mind the same kind of photography that struck me when I was 10; a language capable of increasing people's awareness, but that could also withstand the contemporary debate, questioning the meaning of historical events and denying memory. An ambitious cultural endeavour."

Zizola was 10 years old when he was first struck by the power of photography. "I had asked my father what ‘genocide' meant and he showed me a black-and-white photograph from a book portraying what the Allied Forces found when they entered a Nazi concentration camp - a mass grave full of skeletal corpses. That picture spoke about the horror of war and the folly of human conflicts better than a thousand words," he remembers. "From that day on, photography - and its power to pierce the soul and mind, by means of the reality it portrays - has always been by my side."

To launch 10b, Zizola needed help. "I was aware of the state of the art of photography," he says, "and I knew something about the mounting debate around digital photography and the technological transformations photography in general was going through. At the time, Claudio [Palmisano] was the only one I knew who could conceive digital photography along the lines of traditional photojournalism, and not just within the narrow limits of a technological innovation."

Palmisano first started his career as a computer programmer. "I was interested in the computer's potential as a means of communication," he says. "But one day I was hired by the Italian newspaper, Paese Sera, to build a digital network for its staff photographers." That's when he had a eureka moment. "I realised that images, photographs in particular, could be an even more efficient means of communication, and I became a staff photographer for the newspaper. I was an IT expert, passionate about communication, and a photographer. My encounter with Photoshop was fated."

So, when Zizola approached him, Palmisano didn't think twice. "He wanted me to be his partner in this enterprise; to be in charge of the digital laboratory. I accepted."

Post-Producer
10b is a digital darkroom and, for all intents and purposes, works similarly to an old-fashioned darkroom. "The recent introduction of the raw shooting format has enabled digital photography to share a very similar workflow than with analogue photography," says 10b on its website. "Just like a negative, a raw file cannot be printed the way it is and needs to be ‘developed' first. Contrast, saturation and hue, for example, have to be set during the editing process. This step takes the name of ‘raw conversion' and, with the exception of chemicals, it resembles the developing process of a film."

10b-yuri-kozyrev-02

Before and after. "Toning is harder when the before and after images are quite similar," says Claudio Palmisano of 10b. "In these cases, toning is part of the creative flow, where details make the real difference." Images © Yuri Kozyrev / Noor for Time.

10b is quick to point out that it is not a retouching firm. The term is often associated with Photoshop experts, who are hired to alter the look and shape of fashion icons, for example. So when it comes to defining Palmisano's role, it can get tricky. Is he a "digital photo editor", a "Photoshop editor" or a "post-producer"? "Post-producer semantically belongs to the world of video-making and sounds a little too vague," says Valentina Tordoni of 10b.

"Since language tends to ratify a phenomenon that has ceased to evolve, and that eventually crystallises in the word itself that names it, it seems that this kind of profession is still in the process of seeking ratification from the Italian-speaking community."

Until the perfect term is found, Palmisano identifies himself as 10b's digital laboratory executive director, and this is how he works: "Photographers from all over the world upload their images to our dedicated file server," he explains. "Then I try to get in touch with them over Skype or by phone in order to discuss which style to apply to their images."

Of course, he says, working with a photographer for the first time can be difficult. "You need to tune in with them," he says. "We exchange a fair amount of emails, links to online contact sheets and previews with every new photographer. But once the tuning kicks in, the work gets a lot smoother."

In fact, Palmisano adds, "The relationship can grow so strong that we often send the enhanced images directly to the photographer's client, usually a magazine, and it has happened, in very special occasions, that the photographer hadn't had the time to check the final version before it was delivered." That was the case with some of Kozyrev's images in the early months of 2011 in the Middle East.

Palmisano has been working with Kozyrev for a few years now, and together they have tried out different stylistic interpretations of his work, "depending on the country where he was shooting from, the story he was covering and the historical context". He adds, "Clearly, technology has an impact on a photographer's style. Working on scanned slides is not the same as having raw files. The work on the Arab unrest was certainly influenced by poor and irregular access to satellite internet connection on Yuri's side and, as a consequence, by having to work on a large number of images within a short period of time on my side."

But, he explains, "A limit turned into an opportunity and I had an idea. Since I was working on JPEGs and not on raw files - too big for a satellite internet connection - I built up a complex pre-set action that would soften the sharp contrast typical of JPEG images and convey the first stylistic ‘coat' at the same time. Then I would proceed as always, enhancing one photo at a time, looking for the subject, the proper ‘mood', the ‘punctum'," - the detail that creates a relationship between the viewer and the photograph's subject.

"I like the way he's doing it," says Kozyrev. "I'm amazed by Claudio's knowledge of Photoshop. What he did for me, I could never have done with my laptop, especially since, in most cases, I had no access to the internet or even electricity."

"Working with Yuri on these images was particularly exciting and challenging," says Palmisano. "He had very short and specific deadlines. Yuri would upload the image files to our server at night. With my laptop - no matter where I was - I would remotely connect to our file server and post-produce Yuri's photos. Then, always through a remote connection, I would upload the final image files to the Time file server for Patrick Witty.

"Once I was on a beach in Croatia. I also worked from several of my friends' houses in Rome, taking a break from dinner in order to work on Yuri's images via a wireless internet connection. I have also worked during my holiday in Linosa [a tiny Sicilian island south of Lampedusa, in the Mediterranean Sea], where I was always looking for the best GSM coverage riding on my rented quad bike. Sometimes it felt really weird, I would be in some beautiful place, maybe scubadiving 30 metres underwater in the blue silence of the sea depths, and five minutes later I would be engrossed by my work on Yuri's pictures from the Arab Spring, often concentrating on what would soon become icons of pain and death."

Kozyrev's images have won multiple awards in recent months, including a Visa d'Or, and the Noor photographer is a clear frontrunner in the February 2012 World Press Photo competition.

But is 10b engaging in digital manipulation of these photographers' images? The laboratory's founders don't think so. "We believe that talking of ‘manipulation' is correct only when pixels are ‘moved', therefore when the minimum unit of a digital image is at least either replaced or cloned," says 10b on its website. "In these cases we can talk of a mystification of reality, whose results not only represent something different from the original subject but have also broken the main rule of the photojournalism ethics."

Beyond the digital file
As with the advent of digital photography, 10b is embracing new trends in the world of photojournalism. "In recent years, 10b has broadened its areas of expertise," says Marco Baldovin, who joined the company after he attended a course on Photoediting held by Internazionale magazine at the LUISS Business School in Rome. "The gallery has become one of 10b's central features and is now one of the main venues for photography in Rome," he tells BJP.

"Thanks to the experience we have acquired by printing and producing several exhibitions for our own gallery, we are now also able to offer exhibition design services to our clients. We take care of the printing, mounting and shipping of the pictures, as well as of the graphic design for reference panels and advertising materials (such as flyers, banners and postcards)." In fact, at this year's Visa pour l'Image festival, 10b took over Kozyrev's exhibition - a rare feat. "The hardest part was to convince Jean-François Leroy," says Kozyrev of the festival's director.

But 10b has also opened its own multimedia studio to create interactive applications for smartphones and tablets devices, as well as to design entire websites for photojournalists. "There are at least three factors that, in recent years, have laid the foundations for a significant change in the way photography is distributed and enjoyed by its audience," says Baldovin. "I am talking about the crisis in the publishing industry, the spread of smartphones and tablet devices, and the constant growth of the internet, which is slowly subtracting room from paper-based publications and television broadcasts."

These factors, he adds, are encouraging photographers to rethink the way they tell their stories and portray their subjects. "I think that we haven't fully tested the potential of new technologies and that what we have seen so far was borrowed from traditional media-based formats, in most cases. However, there has been an increasing demand for motion, professional photography website designs and iPad magazines in the past two years. The industry is changing." And this is the challenge that 10b aims to meet.

Visit www.10bphotography.com for more details, or download BJP's iPad app for more examples of 10b work.

10b-yuri-kozyrev-03

Images © Yuri Kozyrev / Noor for Time.

10b-yuri-kozyrev-04

Images © Yuri Kozyrev / Noor for Time.

10b-yuri-kozyrev-05

Images © Yuri Kozyrev / Noor for Time.Wall for debate

Wall for debate

10b Photography recently opened a gallery in Rome, from where it hosts exhibitions, workshops and other cultural events. "The gallery is a constant source of challenge for us," says co-founder Francesco Zizola. "Each exhibition is intended as food for thought for our visitors, but also as a statement, which ought to be interpreted in the context of current events and of the international debate around photography."

In the past couple of years, 10b has exhibited photographers such as Martin Parr, Paolo Pellegrin, Andrew Testa, Frank Horvat, Félix Nadar, Yuri Kozyrev, Alexandra Boulat, Eugene Richards and Stefanor de Luigi. It has also shown Noor's Consequcnes and Solutions group projects. Zizola is a Noor photographer.

"We're also running an educational programme, with workshops, lectures and meetings with renowned authors," he says. "We want to offer a chance for young photographers to meet with professionals with established careers in photojournalism, something that is quite rare in Rome."

The 10b gallery is located at Via San Lorenzo da Brindisi, 10b, in Rome.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

Careful

It is a slippery slope to adjust images for news purposes unless you are okay with the constant complaint of media bias.

Posted by: Ron Cowie on 20 Dec 2011 at 13:21

no problem

i do not see any problem with these images . The truth of them has not been altered in any way. you could argue by making them more appealing to the eye they will gain a bigger audience therefore he is doing his job by spreading the news!
W. Eugene Smith(arguably one of the greatest photographic journalist of the 20th century) used to spend days in the darkroom prefecting a print,then he would make a copy neg of the final one then always work from that copy neg.
Henri Cartier-Bresson never printed his own pictures. where do draw the line and who draws it? noting has been taken out of these pictures and nothing has been added they tell his truth as he saw it. with the help of good post work. to me its the same as printing b/w on grade 5 paper ! great pictures ,great photographer.

Posted by: jeff moore on 20 Dec 2011 at 14:07

Call me old fashioned...

Call me old fashioned, but isn't this what good printers have always done...interpret the neg (or these days, file) for maximum impact within the technical capabilities of the medium to be used for its dissemination.

Posted by: Tony Hopewell on 20 Dec 2011 at 16:47

over-stylised

I have no ethical problem with what's been done to these images, but I do think they look far worse as a result. To my eye they look over-stylised. It's a look which is quite popular with some photojournalists but it really doesn't do it for me at all. The photos were great in the first place. I think some people need to lay off the dodge/burn tool - for me they've gone over the top in some of these (i'm thinking the 2nd and 4th image in particular)

Posted by: ciara on 20 Dec 2011 at 17:35

VERY INTERESTING PIECE

As more and more photojournalists shoot Raw this is a very pertinent article. I have (almost) no problem with the treatment of the images here, nothing is added or taken away; the blind man's eyes are emphasised and the image is editorially stronger as a result. The truth is that when we shot B&W we spent hours in the darkroom to get the best possible prints and we all had our individual styles. There is no reason why the same should not hold true in colour - as long as that "style" is not pushed so far as to be a real distortion of the original scene. My tiny reservation is about the grey smoke being so blackened, it looks a bit unreal as a result.. Finally I think it would be really useful to have an international code of ethics covering what is or is not acceptable for digital treatment of photojournalism..I think ironically this would give photojournalists more creative freedom once the boundaries were agreed..

Posted by: Frank Miller on 20 Dec 2011 at 21:13

A little overhyped

I'm not entirely convinced by this companies great skills. Apart from the first image which appears to be skillfully done all the others look like a simple click on the auto curves button! As usual the images and their subjects gain on clarity but lose on atmosphere and photographic texture. Sometimes its more interesting for areas in the photograph to be obscure.
Was impressed though that Barthes 'punctum' was given a mention, though I think he would have rolled in his grave at the context - he would have refered to this as 'studium' surely?

Posted by: andrew on 20 Dec 2011 at 22:41

Halo in image 4?

Further to ciara's comment, to my eye, image #4 looks as though there is a slight halo around the main subject's head in the processed version, reminiscent of poorly-rendered HDR or careless use of Photoshop's Shadows & Highlights command.

I found it quite jarring - anyone else see it or is it just me?

Posted by: Ken Stewart on 21 Dec 2011 at 01:51

Not sure what this is about...

I think this is an article about nothing! There were no limbs chopped off, or positions changed or perceptions altered. The printers art is alive and well and we can all do the alterations here without difficulty.
Next topic please...

Posted by: Geoff on 21 Dec 2011 at 17:40

perfectly acceptable

I would be perfectly happy with the level of processing here. As other commenters have said, nothing added nothing removed. And I've seen that halo effect often in old black and white photos where the background or sky has been burned in. It happens in my own photographs.

I doubt they're using auto functions in photoshop personally. The retouching is done to too high a standard for that.

They do make the images look a bit like fashion images - high contrast, desaturated skin etc.

Personally i think they know what they are doing.

Posted by: Hugh O'Malley London Fashion and Beauty Photographer on 21 Dec 2011 at 20:19

Ethically fine, but questionable result

I see nothing here of questionable journalistic ethics, but the post-processing itself is overdone, if not badly done.

For instance, I'd say there's a haloing effect on the first image, between the foreground and the sky. Generally just oversharpened and contrast-boosted.
Which is too bad, because it looks like the basic file just needs a little boost in the blacks in ACR or LR3 to have a strong, punchy image.

Posted by: Matt on 21 Dec 2011 at 22:21

Finally!

Finally, some common sense!

Posted by: PAZ on 22 Dec 2011 at 04:18

Print

I thought the images looked much better in print in the December issue of BJP.

Posted by: Chris on 22 Dec 2011 at 22:48

Mostly OK except one

Most of the correction is pretty understated - a bit more contrast, less saturation, lightening faces...
Except for the photo on p63 - not shown online - of evening prayer in Tahrir square, which has had all of the warmth taken out and lost focus on the woman centre left .
Its here in a Time slideshow (it looks a bit darker online):
http://lightbox.time.com/2011/12/14/person-of-the-year-2011-revolution/#6

Posted by: timd on 23 Dec 2011 at 11:05

A Hair's Width

As someone who started in B&W documentary and now resides in broadcast advertising, it's a line thinner than a layer of emulsion between routine and "focusing adjustment" and what's going on here. Editorial now needs a "look" to be good? We're nearing "music video telecine" type adjustments in some of these examples, in their secondary colors plain as day, which isn't needed by any of these images. Sign of the times? Just sad times if that's the case.

Posted by: David William on 23 Dec 2011 at 23:28

Same as printing B&W

Whether you like any particular look or not, this is no different than photographers or their printers have always done. Just because you couldn't do much with a 'chrome after the fact is no reason not to try to optimize your image as best you can.
The idea that you can't dodge or burn or adjust contrast is just absurd!

Posted by: Charly Franklin on 25 Dec 2011 at 02:51

Basic tweaks

These edits look like what i do on a daily basis using lightroom for 5 minutes per image.

Contrast reduction
Blacks increased
Saturation dropped
Clarity set to max

Seriously a lab is not needed for edits like this unless you have no time in your work flow to accommodate them.

And another thing, all images are representation's know matter how their treated, so what does it matter how their edited?

Posted by: Lee Coates on 16 Jan 2012 at 18:29

They look better

There is nothing wrong with these examples except they look better.

Posted by: David Saxe on 07 Feb 2012 at 22:08

No thanks

So that is "pro"? I dont like it, sorry. Looks better unprocessed for most samples.

Posted by: bjplooker on 12 Mar 2012 at 10:50

If you call this world's best - God save the customers

To devote an article and hype it by saying that it is worlds leading post production unit would be a fallacy here.

The quality of work is quite unsatisfactory and the sort that any stumbling neophyte on Photoshop can handle in 3 days time.

Seems more like a media exercise for unsuspecting new business.

Posted by: Anoop Negi on 26 Mar 2012 at 18:04

If you call this world's best - God save the customers

To devote an article and hype it by saying that it is worlds leading post production unit would be a fallacy here.

The quality of work is quite unsatisfactory and the sort that any stumbling neophyte on Photoshop can handle in 3 days time.

Seems more like a media exercise for unsuspecting new business.

Posted by: Anoop Negi on 26 Mar 2012 at 18:05

Updating your subscription status Loading