Association of Photographers cancels Awards ceremony

george-logan-advertising

Image © George Logan, Gold winner in the Commissioned Advertising Series category at the Association of Photographers Awards 2010.

The Association of Photographers, which has just announced its 2010 Photographers Awards winners, has been forced to cancel its ceremony as its members "continue to suffer from the economic downturn"

Author: Olivier Laurent

The Association of Photographers has announced the winners of its 27th Photographers Awards, with 15 Best in Category awards and six Gold awards. Photographers Andy Green, George Logan, Paul Thompson, David Ryle, Paul Wenham-Clarke and Michael Meyersfeld lead the list of winners, each having received one of the coveted Gold awards.

However, the winners were announced, this year, online as the AoP was forced to cancel its high-profile awards ceremony usually held at Sadlers Wells in east London. Speaking to BJP, Kingsley Marten, the AoP's managing director, says that the decision was made after the organisation failed to cover the costs from last year's ceremony. "We have always held a very grand presentation which for the last few years was at Sadlers Wells theatre," he says. "However, despite good numbers at last year’s event, we failed to cover the costs of putting it on, which we can see was directly related to the recession!"

He continues: "One large contributory factor was a sudden lack of ticket sales to commissioners, agents and agencies from within the industry, in the weeks immediately leading up to the event, which left us short of income to help cover the cost. Previously we enjoyed strong ticket sales and agents and agencies would normally buy ten tickets each, for staff and guests; but last year many of these firms had let large numbers of people go, before we held the event and those they still employed were basically told to buy their own tickets, if they wanted to come."

As a consequence, when the AoP started to plan this year's event, says Marten, it realised that the economic difficulties facing its members would continue to impact the ceremony. "Therefore [they] would not be able to support us as they might wish in 2010," he says. "So, it was announced to members at the annual general meeting, in addition to various communications we send to all members, that we would not be able to afford to hold a grand presentation evening this year and rather than hold a much smaller event that people would no doubt compare to previous years and feel disappointed or let down by, we decided instead to announce the winners online."

He adds: "It was a hard choice, but a necessary one and despite it, more images were entered to this year’s awards than there were last year, which was a bumper year itself. It is still a very challenging time for all of us in the industry and whilst we are very disappointed not to be holding the presentation event, we felt it prudent to take the decisions we have, to enable us to continue to campaign, lobby and provide other services that are fundamental to members."

Instead, the organisation has decided to hold three Private Views over the next few weeks at the AoP Gallery where the winning images will be shown starting next week. From 21 September until 30 September, a selection of images from the Commissioned Advertising, Design and Editorial categories will be on show. From 05 October and for 10 days, the winners in the non-commissioned Body, Environment and Object categories will get their own exhibition before being replaced on 19 October by the Commissioned Documentary, Innovation, Moving Image and Best Commercial Use of Photography images.

For more details, visit www.the-awards.com.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

In difficult times we need the support of the photography media not incorrect criticism

It is always very much appreciated by galleries, photographers, and arts organisation when photography & arts magazines decide to cover an event. Certainly getting coverage is always difficult in this competitive and difficult world.

However it would be nice if the coverage by the BJP was supportive of such a terrific organisation and this leading awards event, rather than critical, after all the AOP has well over 1,500 members of different type.

A lot of people are working very hard in the best interests of photographers and sadly this article does show the respect deserved.

A written apology by the editor and a withdrawal of this article would be much appreciated.

The apology could be deliver to Becky Kelly of the AOP, who has worked incredibly hard to make this a huge success.

These are the opinions of Duncan Caratacus Clark and not those of any other organisation.

Thank you kindly

Duncan Caratacus Clark
Art Consultant / Fine Art Photographer.

Posted by: Duncan Caratacus Clark on 14 Sep 2010 at 20:31

What's incorrect

Dear Duncan,

Our article on the AOP Awards is neither critical or inaccurate, so unless you can point out any mistakes, I have no plans to make any changes to our article.

The cancellation of the reception wasn’t communicated, and so of course that had to be the focus of our article. It was something of a surprise to get the announcement as an email with a link.

We have been, and continue to be, very supportive of the AOP and its efforts, and having known many staff personally in previous years, I am well aware of their efforts.

However, this is news, and it is our duty to report it to our readers.

Posted by: Simon Bainbridge (editor of BJP) on 15 Sep 2010 at 13:20

Cold.

The problem, I think, with the aop awards is that every year the chosen images seem to look the same as the years previously - deadpan. Photography that has not moved on. It lacks dynamism, humor and freshness and leaves the viewer cold. Maybe the organizations that support it feel the same.

Posted by: Matt James on 17 Sep 2010 at 18:31

Updating your subscription status Loading