Kuwait's ban on DSLRs was a hoax

Pentax K-5

The photography press around the world, BJP included, fell for it. Last week, Kuwait Times revealed that three Kuwaiti ministries had banned the use of digital SLRs in public places. The information, it turns out, was false

Author: Olivier Laurent

Embarrassing it is - both for the Kuwait Times newspaper and the many photography magazines around the world, BJP included, that relayed the information. Last week, the newspaper published an article claiming that the Kuwaiti Ministry of Information, Ministry of Social Affairs and Ministry of Finance had banned the use of digital SLRs in public places such as streets and shopping malls.

According to the newspaper, the ban would have affected all amateur photographers, as well as most professional photographers - unless they used their DSLRs for journalism purposes.

However, in an unexpected reversal, Kuwait Times has published an erratum. "On Saturday, November 20, 2010 the Kuwait Times published an article titled 'Multi ministry camera ban frustrates artists' in which incorrect information was provided," the statement reads. "The newspaper regrets failing to verify the information. The article wrongly stated that a ban on DSLR cameras was implemented by the Ministries of Information, Social Affairs and Finance. This information is false."

It adds: "In a follow up investigation, it was proved that no such ban has been issued. We regret this error and deeply apologize for any inconvenience caused."

 

Original article published on 23 November 2010:

Three Kuwaiti ministries have banned the use of digital SLRs in public places for purposes other than journalism, Kuwait Times reports.

The Kuwaiti Ministry of Information, Ministry of Social Affairs and Ministry of Finance have banned the use of digital SLRs in public places such as streets and shopping malls, according to Kuwait Times, and as reported by Amateur Photographer magazine.

The ban, which comes after the Kuwaiti government introduces new stringent rules on communication, will affect all amateur photographers, as well as most professional photographers - unless they use their DSLRs for journalism purposes, says Kuwait Times.

Point-and-shoot cameras as well as camera phones can still be used, says the government.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

DSLR or not to DSLR

Has any specification been given to the police on how to determine if it is a DSLR or not. Are film SLRs still permitted, What about the top line of bridge or crossover cameras that look like DSLRs? I would not want to argue with one of those chappies about the status of my camera if his aim is to get it out of my hands and into his. Legal theft.

Posted by: Ross on 23 Nov 2010 at 17:43

Rediculas

A point and shoot in the hands of a pro is just as potent, if that is what they are worried about. Better not educate the ignorant. .Times are changing but technology is moving faster, the days of the large cameras are slowly coming to an end.

Posted by: Dave on 23 Nov 2010 at 19:35

Hahaha

Hahah..That is one funny bill passed. I guess some ruler might have failed to get a clear image in DSLR. Or he thinks DSLR is the finest word of photography.

Posted by: SAF on 24 Nov 2010 at 05:47

Consultants

Is this a sure sign they've been taking on UK security "advisers"? It all points to some of our less bright ex Met/CoL officers, or perhaps the former private security jobsworths who are usually at the root of all woes in London.

You know we're near the bottom when you're merely slightly surprised that a repressive Middle-East regime has pipped us to the post.

Posted by: Mark on 24 Nov 2010 at 07:47

Large format

what about if I pull out an 8x10 camera? I'd still be ok?

Posted by: Patrick on 24 Nov 2010 at 14:06

PAR 4 THE COURSE

When working in Dubai 1978 setting up one of the first Car rental Companies and being asked by Gulf Air and Hilton Hotels because we had coaches to take Tourists around the Emirates I went afterwards to the Gov. Ministry to say they should set up Ministry of Tourism. Reply we don't need them we have Oil. Sharjah police tested Radar speed guns in the dark it stopped after Policemen got run over. Abu Dhabi Ruler told me I could not set up a Motor Racing as he did not want young locals killing themselves now it's the last race in F1 calendar. In the 1st Gulf war they tried to stop people putting up Sat. Dishes for CNN plus. Iraq was letting TV crews broadcast live from Baghdad. My Indian Accountant was not allowed to register a 750cc motorbike because it was bigger than the Police Bikes. and many more but Man u is on TV, Football being the new UK religion Got 2 go

Posted by: JAMES BIRD on 24 Nov 2010 at 19:42

We should Have left it to Sadam....

I don't want to bloody go there anyway.......

What a ridiculous law!

Posted by: madjeff on 24 Nov 2010 at 20:14

Rangefinders anyone

I wonder if the leica & voigtlaender agent has a lot of stock to clear
Chris

Posted by: Chris Osborne on 25 Nov 2010 at 18:28

Ask them

Has anybody considered asking the relevant authorities in Kuwait, why they have banned Dslrs
And is the ban on using them, or owning them, possessing them etc.

Posted by: L Drazek on 27 Nov 2010 at 11:16

Due diligence

There's a lot to be said for due diligence. And reading the article before you comment on it, or so it seems!

Posted by: Mark on 29 Nov 2010 at 10:50

Rumour

The news about the DSLR photography ban in Kuwait turned out to be incorrect.

Kuwait Times retracted the news:

http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=MzAwMTg4ODg1

It would be nice of you if you can write an update accordingly.

Posted by: Musti on 29 Nov 2010 at 17:15

Belief

Why did we all assume this report to be true? Now if it had been the National Trust imposing the ban.....

Posted by: Alan on 03 Dec 2010 at 14:24

Updating your subscription status Loading