Daniel Morel, CBS settle case

Defend your photo rights - moral rights and copyrights

Freelance photographer Daniel Morel and CBS have settled their legal fight, a couple of week after a judge issued an order that put the Haiti-based photographer in a stronger position

Author: Olivier Laurent

BJP can confirm that CBS has decided to settle with the freelance photographer Daniel Morel, who accused the network of using, without authorisation, images he shot on 12 January 2010 when a earthquake struck Haiti.

While the details of the settlement are confidential, BJP understands that the outcome favoured the photographer, who has found himself in a much stronger legal position after a New York District Judge squashed a motion to dismiss requested by Agence France Presse, Getty Images, CBS and CNN.

For more details on that order, read our extensive report Court hands Morel his first victory in AFP case (31 December 2010).

CBS is the second network to settle with the photographer. In late 2010, ABC, which also used Morel's images without authorisation, also brought to an end its case. The settlement details were also confidential.

It leaves only Agence France Presse, Getty Images and CNN opposing Morel. AFP tells BJP that it will continue to seek a settlement with the photographer.

Follow our full coverage of the case:

"We will prevail," says AFP of Morel case (04 January 2011)

Court hands Morel his first victory in AFP case (31 December 2010)

Morel to pursue legal case (08 November 2010)

AFP v. Morel: Judges reserves decision in AFP dismissal request (29 September 2010)

AFP v. Morel: the debate rages on (27 September 2010)

Court date set in AFP v. Morel case (22 September 2010)

JFL hits back at critics in AFP/Morel copyright case (14 June 2010)

No Visa support for Morel in Haiti case (09 June 2010)

Agence France Presse's slap to photographers (28 April 2010)


  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

Daniel Morel

I have to say that I am very impressed by how Daniel has gone about with his case, thus far. I know that he has been through a lot, and there are many more battles to fight, before he gets to the end of this particular matter. That said, hat's off to him for how he has conducted things thus far, and I wish him and his legal team all of the best.

The importance of this particular case cannot be overstated, and serves as a reminder that your creative works is inviolable, even in the new electronic frontier. It has real value, and that you need to fight and push for that value every single day, with everything that you have at your disposal. Believe me, if it had no value, the Gettys and AFPs of the worlds would not be fighting so hard on the opposing side.

We live in an era where the forces for free are pushing at every level (law making, commerce, legal, distribution etc.) to devalue your work and your ownership of such work. It doesn't serve their business model to allow you to claim perpetual ownership to your creations, nor does it serve them to allow you to manage how that work is used. They want it to be free and to be used by anyone, because the more stuff that goes flying around the internet, unhindered, the more money they make.

We also live in a world where the large-scale purveyors of photographic content have participated in this devaluation. Now, we stand witness to the behavior of two such purveyors, Getty Images and Agence France Presse, as they use the entirety of their financial muscle to attempt to wrestle fundamental rights from a lone photographer…. This is how little regard these businesses seem to have for the very business that they are in. They should have settled this matter, without contest, on the very day that they recognized that they knowingly distributed someone’s work without their permission. Makes you wonder how often they commit this particular offense, that they would put so much money and resources into denying what we all know to be true.

So, to circle back, I am really impressed by Daniel, his defense team and their tenaciousness in prosecuting this wrong. Along with everyone else, I can only hope for a positive outcome, as the alternative will be devastating to the collective interests of all content creators.

Good luck, Daniel

Posted by: Frank Evers on 09 Jan 2011 at 19:52

Updating your subscription status Loading