Independent photographers win big at World Press Photo (update: 12.33)

15wolfram-hahn

Image © Wolfram Hahn, Germany. Winner of Second Prize in Portraits Stories, World Press Photo 2011.

Independent photographers have been heavily recognised in this year's World Press Photo contest, ahead of agencies such as Getty Images, Associated Press and Reuters

Author: Olivier Laurent

More than 14 independent photographers, without affiliations nor assignments, have been recognised in this year's World Press Photo. However, that number could be higher considering that five Panos Pictures photographers also received prizes - Panos represents independent photographers - as well as two Reportage by Getty Images members.

Getty Images has received six prizes, while Reuters and Contrasto have three each. Agence France Presse, Associated Press, Institute for Artist Management and Vii Photo all have two, followed by Agence VU', Newsweek, EFE and Redux, each with one.

 

Speaking to BJP, Josh Lustig, assignments editor at Panos Pictures, believes this year's independent wins "show, to a certain extent, that photographers are having to do more themselves to tell the stories they want to tell. I still think that agencies have an important role to play, but we're seeing a lot more successful photographers realise that they can be less reliant on agencies."

But, Lustig adds, "they are being forced to be more independent because these assignments are a lot less frequent than they used to be."

"A lot of this work was done by photographers who decided they wanted to do a story and then got someone to come on board with them," said David Burnett, photojournalist and chair of this year's World Press Photos general jury. "The take away message is to just think of the things you want to do and do them. Get started and built up a bank of images, and at that point people will back you.

"Not all of the pictures [that won awards] were published - a lot were unpublished. It’s not a rule I made but it’s a rule I’m in favour of. A story being published doesn’t necessarily mean any validation other than that one editor thought it was worth publishing, and so many vague elements go into that."

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

One agency missing, at least...

Hi, in the list of agencies with winners you missed at least the Spanish agency EFE, with one winner.

Posted by: Juanma on 11 Feb 2011 at 12:24

Thanks for the correction

That's been changed Juanma – an incredible image it is too:

http://www.worldpressphoto.org/index.php?option=com_photogallery&task=view&id=2052&Itemid=293&bandwidth=high

Posted by: Simon Bainbridge (editor of BJP) on 11 Feb 2011 at 17:00

poor choice

Since few years the quality of the pictures is really getting down. There is so much great photographer out there.. and what we see in the final selection of WPP is very poor compare to the global production every year.
I was glad to see the winner of WPP for many years. Now it represents nothing to me.
I wont even speak about google view.

Posted by: Frederic Belge on 11 Feb 2011 at 17:39

Jodi Bieber won two awards

Totally understandable that it was overlooked, especially since she took the top prize today...but it is important to note that Jodi also won the 1st Prize for Portraits Single. So, two top prizes to Jodi Bieber (INSTITUTE for Artist Management).

Posted by: Frank Evers on 11 Feb 2011 at 18:12

I agree with those coments

Looking to past WPP winners and looking to this year winners, it´s a big difference between them. I think too that the poor quality is now winning. I would not like that next years will be so poor. Please, a little beat of quality!!!

Posted by: DAVID APREA NAVARRETE on 14 Feb 2011 at 15:11

Updating your subscription status Loading