World Press Photo: Does the winning image reference Michelangelo's Pietà?

world-press-photo-samuel-aranda

A woman holds a wounded relative during protests against president Saleh. Sanaa, Yemen, 15 October © Samuel Aranda, Spain, for The New York Times, World Press Photo of the Year 2011.

Samuel Aranda's winning image of a veiled woman holding the body of an injured man has been compared to Michelangelo's Pietà - a sculpture depicting Mary clutching the body of Jesus. We find out more, speaking with the World Press Photo judges and Aranda.

Author: Olivier Laurent and Diane Smyth

"There's been discussions about connections between Samuel Aranda's image and the Pietà," admits jury member Nina Berman. "I was a big supporter of this image and I think it's fantastic that Christian audiences can connect in a way that is compassionate and not prejudicial with the Muslim world," she tells BJP. "And if they have to do it through their own Christian icons, then fine. That's what art is for."

During the judging process, says Aidan Sullivan, "we didn't make any references to the Pietà. But I think there was always this feeling that it had a religious undertone."

For Manoocher Deghati, the regional photo manager for Associated Press in the Middle East, it was the first thing you could see. "You also see the Algerian Madonna picture [shot by Hocine Zaourar in 1997 and which also won a World Press Photo the following year]," he says. "Icons are icons. I think that's fine. I think it's eye-catching, and the fact the man is naked but the woman is completely clothed makes it even more interesting."

Deghati adds: "I think it's important also because in the West we believe women have been oppressed [in the Middle East] but this gives another human face to her choices."

For Koyo Kouoh, the founder and artistic director Raw Material Company, it's normal that Aranda's image would refer us to Michelangelo's Pietà. "The image of the pieta is something imprinted in human DNA," he says. "It is something that is always inside us. And I don't think [it was intentional]. Maybe afterwards there is a lot of reading and interpretation of the image but I don't think he was pushing to make that reference. He just captured a moment."

Aranda confirms that fact to BJP. "It was not intentional," he says on the phone. "You know how it is in these situations - it was really tense and chaotic. In these situations, you just shoot photos. It is what it is. We're just photographers. I consider myself just a worker. I just witness what is going on in front of me, and shoots photos. That's it."

But, for Berman, this connotation could help build a bridge between people. "This is how humans touch each other. We often believe, us in the Western world, that women that are fully-veiled are somehow less complete people. But even though you don't see her face, she's a very strong character in that picture. That was very important for me."

For more coverage of the World Press Photo results, check www.bjp-online.com/tag/world-press-photo.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

Congratulations!

The professionalism of the photographer comes through amazingly when he says:-

"In these situations, you just shoot photos. It is what it is. We're just photographers. I consider myself just a worker. I just witness what is going on in front of me, and shoots photos. That's it."

No ego or any personality getting in the way of the situation. Congrats to the prize winner and in awe of the evident humility.

I had to google Michelangelo's Pietà after reading this but to be honest, I did not have to in order to read or like the photo. It enabled me to witness a beautiful moment well worth capturing showing photojournalism's power to speak to audiences in an accessible language.

p.s. "But I think there was always this feeling that it had a religious undertone." - a photo of a fully-veiled muslim woman has a 'religious undertone'? My word those WPP jury members abstract feelings are sharp aren't they!!

Posted by: Congratulations! on 10 Feb 2012 at 16:43

What about ?

Ironic that you feel necessary to link in to a Christian icon for it to make sense to you.
Jews, like Muslims, Buddhists or atheists have no idea what the Pieta is and even if they do, they certainly do not have a connection to it.
Why can't a photography journal appreciate an image for what it is instead to what it references too ?

Posted by: Grappy Gosto on 10 Feb 2012 at 17:45

Accusing for linking to a familiar subject is a suprise

Dear Grappy Gosto I am afraid your comment depicts ignorance of semiotics, postmodern theory, and in general every important philosophical concept and theory, including art and the art of photography.

Humans think by references, by hypertext and by linking to familiar subjects.
As many comments have said the picture is a masterpiece showing the universality of human suffering.
For many of us familiar with art, believers or not, the image rings the same bells as El Greco Pietas or Michael Angelo's, but always as a reference to the universal suffering.
This is about art and familiarity not religion.
In the same spirit I would have to accuse you for using English which is not my mother language.

Posted by: et on 10 Feb 2012 at 21:01

"Your comment depicts ignorance"

Dear et,

I just liked the photo for the moment. I have not got a clue about what you are on about.

I guess that makes most people like me undeserving of the higher art form that is photography.

I think photography is great. Look at Photodump from VICE magazine and have a laugh.

I love photography but I guess if you are right, my ignorance means that I do not deserve to love something I do not fully understand.

Maybe I should not be here at all as I no longer feel clever or welcome enough.

Or maybe I have to work harder to be part of this culture before being accepted as part of its audience?

Regards,

An ignorant lover of photographs.

P.S There is a massive hint here as to why photojournalism has become so out of touch as a medium of mass communication.

Posted by: "ignorance of semiotics, postmodern theory" on 15 Feb 2012 at 00:42

et too snobus?

'For many of us familiar with art' - loved this line! Oh et, your post really has made my day. The harder you have try, the less you can achive.

Posted by: Seb on 22 Feb 2012 at 12:09

Updating your subscription status Loading