Alamy, the London-based stock imagery company, has announced it will cut photographers' commission rates from January 2013
Author: Olivier Laurent
20 Nov 2012 Tags: Alamy
Alamy says the reduction in commission rate from 60 percent to 50 percent will help fund expansion plans. "We're investing in our future," says CEO James West in a prepared statement. "When we last made a change to commission rates it was to fund our expansion into the US, and today that area of the business accounts for over 40 percent of our sales.
He adds: "We are going to invest the extra revenue from this change in research and development, new products and services, and new marketing initiatives. We have ambitious plans to gain market share from our competitors and grow the business."
Under the new terms, photographers will receive 50 percent on all direct sales, while revenue generated from images sold as part of the Alamy Blue model will be split 50/50 between the stock agency and the contributor. For images sold as part of Alamy's Distribution model, photographers will receive 30 percent on all sales, down from 40 percent.
In a video statement, West explains that, despite the changes, Alamy will remain competitive. "When we look at what the competition is doing, if you supply images to Getty or iStock, Corbis or Shutterstock, you're going to earn 15 to 40 percent for your content. Alamy will still be paying more than our rivals, so I don't feel there's a huge pressure to explain what we're doing now. It's really a long-term question."
Alamy now plans to unveil a new website with "increased functionality, clearer and simplified navigation, and a generally enhanced user experience".
For more about the changes, visit the Alamy website.
Why don't they raise money by selling some stock in the company, or better yet, apply a photographer's lost 10% revenue towards private stock in the company.
The way this works currently, the company is investing a large amount of someone else's money (the photographers') under the as yet unfulfilled promise of increased future revenue. Worst case, they get an extra 10% and best case the sales increase and they continue to keep the extra 10%. This is a smoke screen.
Don't we all wish that we could all "invest" in our businesses by paying our suppliers less. I thought if I was investing in my business, it meant that I borrowed money, sold stock, or simply took home less in my pocket. If Alamy cannot compete with the current pricing structure, just say so. For now, they are still the best agency for my photos. If their move results in better volume that may continue to be the case, but we will all be watching.
@Ed Carlton, 10 points is greater than 10% revenue
Ed Carlton, you wrote that photographers stand to lose 10% revenue. Incorrect. Actually a 10 point royalty drop by alamy results in a 25% decrease in revenue to photographers on distributor sales, and a 17% decrease in revenue on direct sales. See http://tinyurl.com/alamyroyalties
Related Articles
BJP Daily
Most Popular Articles
World Press Photo controversy: Objectivity, manipulation and the search for truth
Updating your subscription status
About us

British Journal of Photography is the world’s longest running photography magazine, established in 1854, and online since 1997. A high-quality monthly printed edition is available as a subscription or from selected newsagents in the UK and around the world.
Jobs
We have a vacancy for a Key Account Manager working on The British Journal of Photography
Magnet Harlequin, one of the UK's leading Creative Production Agencies is seeking a new Head of Photography.
Bonhams is looking for a full-time photographer for its sale catalogues
Popular Topics