The New Economics of Photojournalism: The rise of Instagram

instagram-matt-eich-20120731-13

Image © Matt Eich

Instagram has enjoyed unprecedented success, with more than 80 million users who now include some of the world's most renowned photojournalists. Olivier Laurent speaks with them about how Instagram is shaping the photographic industry

Author: Olivier Laurent

Instagram, the brainchild of software engineers Kevin Systrom and Michel Krieger, was launched in October 2010 to almost little notice. At the time, the iPhone app was competing against Hipstamatic, which enjoyed particular popularity even in the photojournalism community. In its first two months of existence, Instagram still managed to attract one million users. Fast-forward to August 2012, and Instagram now boasts more than 80 million users who have shared four billion images. The app is available on both the iPhone and Android devices, and its staff have been acquired by Facebook for more then $730m.

Instagram is more than just a filter application for iPhone and Android phone users. Its goal, as defined by Systrom and Krieger, was to make mobile phone photography fast, simple and beautiful. "When we sat down to start designing our product, we looked at digital photos and realised very few exciting things had happened in the last five years," they wrote in a blog post in late 2010. Systrom and Krieger set out to change that. For example, mobile phone users found that even though the megapixel count on their devices kept going up, most of their images lacked a specific "mood and tone". Enter Instagram's filters.

The developers also found that people didn't always know how to get their images from their phone to their friends. "Some of your friends want to follow your every update in life; others like seeing some occasional posts on Facebook," they said. "We made it super-simple to share photos, not only with your followers in the Instagram community, but with Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and Tumblr, all with a tap of the switch." Systrom and Krieger also made sure the "uploading, sharing and viewing experiences" would be "as smooth and speedy as possible".

These three features have helped transformed Instagram into a juggernaut. It has attracted celebrities such as Barack Obama, Jamie Oliver, Ryan Seacrest, Jessica Alba, Justin Bieber and Oprah Winfrey, who now have hundreds of thousands of followers, if not more - Obama has 1.2 million while Bieber has 2.8 million.

The app's success has also attracted brands, with Starbucks, MTV, McDonalds, Nike and even Tiffany & Co opening their own accounts – sharing, in most cases, behind-the-scenes images of their operations. And with 80 million potential followers, it's understandable why these companies would take a particular interest in the app.

But one household name was quick to realise Instagram's full potential. A few weeks after its launch, Instagram signed its first major brand partnership with National Geographic. When the deal was first announced, the goal was for National Geographic to share photo tips and offer photography challenges to its followers. But in recent months, it has become an integral part of the magazine's operations, with professional photographers taking over NatGeo's feed of images, reporting instantly from their travels and photo shoots. As a result, a number of renowned photographers have created their own accounts and are now building their own following of dedicated photography enthusiasts.

"I must say, it was my 14-year-old daughter who got me hooked and showed me how to use it," admits VII Photo member Ed Kashi. "I love photography, so I completely enjoy the creativity and opportunities to make photographs virtually at any moment and share them with the world."

ed-kashi-01

My daughter, Isabel, through the screen of our back porch in Montclair, NJ, July 2012 © Ed Kashi

Kashi joined Instagram in May 2011, but only started using the app seriously three months ago, sharing personal images, as well as images he shoots for the NatGeo feed. At the time of writing, he had just finished his takeover of The New Yorker's account on an assignment in Colorado. With these Instagram takeovers, as they are called, Kashi tells BJP that his audience is growing. As of 31 August, Kashi had more than 3150 followers – up from 1900 a day before he started working for The New Yorker.

Marcus Bleasdale is another member of the VII Photo Agency that has joined Instagram. "I approach the app as a tool to share with those who are interested in the backstory of the work we create," he tells BJP in an email interview. "It is a way we can share more about the people we are and what motivates us – not just in the field, but at home too."

Bleasdale says the app offers a unique opportunity to share more about how photographers create their images, but also snapshots of the places they travel to and the people they meet along the way. Of course, he adds, "I would never share my formal final edit on this platform, but I am happy using it as a way of sharing my visual diary with people who are interested."

Magnum Photos member John Vink joined Instagram for its convenience. "It offers an immediate way to put photographs on the web that were taken with the iPhone," he tells BJP. "And I joined mainly to keep a presence there when I can't access my computer or my iPad." Vink uses Instagram for personal purposes. "I mainly post trivial or family-related stuff," he says. "I am not using Instagram intensely. What I post is much more mood-related than what I post on my weblog. The weblog, connected to Facebook, Tumblr and Twitter is still my backbone for communicating."

instagram-john-vink-02

Belgium, Brussels, 12/07/2012: Baryte vintage prints to sort and sign. Image © John Vink

instagram-john-vink-01

Cambodia. Phnom Penh, 8/04/2012: Tom Boonen winning Paris Roubaix. Image © John Vink

Sean Gallagher, a freelance photographer, added Instagram to his workflow when he realised how successful and popular the app had become. "I thought it might be a useful addition to the networks I use," he tells me in a Facebook conversation. "But, I've only been using it for a month or two and, like with many of these networks, I'm still in an experimental phase with it, trying to figure out the audience and how the platform can realistically compliment and fit it in with my workflow."

Much like most professional photographers on Instagram, Gallagher started sharing "behind-the-scenes snapshots" that show how he works as a photojournalist. "But I quickly realised that people were more interested in seeing good pictures. My aim now is to post images that relate to my work on environmental issues in Asia and pique my audience's interest, hopefully encouraging them to explore the subjects that I cover." Gallagher also found it helped to post detailed captions with his images, just like he would do if submitting to a magazine or agency. "I think it encourages people to find out more."

One agency that has actively been using Instagram is Luceo, which until recently included David Walter Banks, Kendrick Brinson, Matt Eich, Kevin German, Daryl Peveto and Matt Slaby. "Instagram is, to 2012, what photoblogging was to 2007," say Peveto and Slaby in an email conversation. "Not only does it offer an immediate and interactive way for our fans to be a part of our work as it happens, it also allows us to engage with other visual professionals and receive real-time feedback on work as it is being produced."

instagram-matt-eich-20120520-14

Image © Matt Eich

Eich agrees. The photographer, who, along with Banks and Brinson, left Luceo in August, has been using the photo-sharing social network to send "mobile dispatches", he says. "It is a fluid form of visual note-taking and allows a seamless interaction with an ever-expanding mobile community. In the Mississippi Delta town of Greenwood, where I am working on Sin & Salvation in Baptist Town, the young people, both in Baptist Town and in the more affluent neighbourhood across the river, use this platform to communicate with their peers. I love the fact that they could both follow my image feed and get glimpses into the lives of neighbours they would never interact with, though their lives occur in close proximity."

He adds: "I think the interactive storytelling/audience engagement aspect is the most fascinating part about all social media, but that aside, right now Instagram is a great way to keep up with my colleagues as they travel, get sneak peeks into what they're doing, and feel involved from afar. It'll probably reach a critical mass at some point and get to be too much, but it's fun while it lasts."

instagram-matt-eich-20120330-20

Image © Matt Eich

Speaking with these photographers, it quickly becomes apparent that Instagram, more than any other social network in past years, has allowed them to form a deeper connection with the general public. For John Stanmeyer, another VII photographer that uses Instagram, it's all about "communication, communication, communication", he tells BJP. "In the decades to come, the entire discussion of whether to use this thing called social media will be a moot, archaic point of view – no different than it was centuries ago, when previous commonly used means of information distribution where invented and debated: ‘Should I write on papyrus leaf or this newfangled material called paper, or a typewriter instead of block-type printing presses, etc?'"

Stanmeyer started using Instagram when he worked for National Geographic, and has since continued to share both personal images as well as photographs relating to his assignments – most recently when he was in South Sudan with Médecins Sans Frontières. "There's a dreadful health crisis occurring right now in Yida. Over the past eight months, more than 60,000 Sudanese have fled the fighting around the Nuba mountain region of Sudan. And in just the last month, health conditions have deteriorated to catastrophic levels. Death rates due to acute malnutrition among children have reached more than double the typical crisis level – the problem is not lack of food, it's sanitation and clean water. With the beginning of the rainy season in recent weeks, malaria is exploding."

Médecins Sans Frontières sent Stanmeyer to south Sudan early, allowing him to spend four or five days in the north of the country to raise awareness about the crisis. But, a few days before he boarded his plane, he talked with Jason Cone, head of communications with the NGO in the US. "We discussed the option of going as far and wide as possible, to raise awareness by both using print and social media. We wanted to reach an additional quarter of a million Médecins Sans Frontières' Twitter followers, tens of thousands on Facebook, and even more on Instagram." To achieve that, Stanmeyer emailed Ken Geiger, National Geographic's assistant director of photography, asking if he could publish some images about this crisis on the magazine's Instagram account. "Once in Nairobi, his email arrived with an emphatic yes, allowing these important issues to reach nearly 200,000 additional minds."

He adds: "In what would have been considered meaningful issue awareness in print magazines is now amplified, especially when you combine the potential viewership of MSF, VII, NatGeo, as well as personal viewers and followers, allowing us to spread the message of this crisis to well over 500,000 people. It's a powerful communication tool."

Connecting directly and personally with that audience has almost become a requirement for photojournalists as the traditional print market in changing. For example, over the past few years, Luceo has been trying to define what a visual company should be in the 21st century. "We are no longer looking at content creation as the only means of income and creative expression," say Peveto and Slaby. "How content is displayed and distributed is critical in reaching broader audiences, finding more creative ways to engage that audience and inviting them to participate in the process." And Instagram, they say, help them achieve these goals. "It helps us connect with our audience organically and offers different options for sharing, such as creating parallel narratives with larger projects, sharing behind-the-scenes experiences, opening a dialogue with our audience, and cross-platform geo-tagging and mapping integration."

instagram-luceo-01b

instagram-luceo-01

Some Luceo members use Instagram as a sort of notebook to document ideas while they are working. Matt Slaby has edited his Instagram images into a perpetually updating gallery of diptychs on our site called Currently Trending. Image © Matt Slaby/Luceo

Eich, who was still part of Luceo as the collective was reassessing the way it communicates with its audience, displays his mobile dispatches not only through Instagram's application, but also via his websites. "There's an InstaFeed on my website and microsites for each project I'm working on," he says. "I'm hash-tagging these projects with things like #thesevencities, #carrymeohio or #baptisttown so that the project begins to stick with people a little bit, even as it is being produced, and so people can easily go and see what exists in this sort of ephemeral form."

James Estrin, a photographer for The New York Times and co-founder of the newspaper's Lens blog, believes photographers can profit from deeper interaction with their audiences. "I think you can have interactions that are, in the long term, beneficial to you economically without monetising each interaction," he tells BJP in a phone interview. "That's what social media is about. We don't need, every time we interact with a member of the public, to make money out of it. With The New York Times, there are 40-50 million potential readers within the US. Now, The New York Times, to be successful economically, doesn't need to monetise every single interaction with these people. What they need is to have these people think of themselves as being New York Times people. They need to feel part of a community of like-minded people, interacting with the newspaper via a variety of platforms. Each of these interactions strengthens the relationship."

He adds: "In photography, the key is to build an audience of people who have some relationship with what you're doing – either with you personally or via the issues you're covering. These are people who may, one day, buy your book, or support you on Kickstarter or Emphas.is. The question is: What does Instagram mean to a photographer? I think it means strengthening the relationship between you and your potential audience – the people most inclined to spend money on you. Everything that strengthens your relationship with your audience, especially in this day and age, can strengthen your reach and ability to monetise your work."

For Brinson, for example, Instagram allows her to keep "an ongoing conversation with the photo editors and art buyers who follow me", she says. "They know where I am and what I'm working on." Her husband, Banks, has even started to work with clients to create mobile images "which they can share to tease a feature story or project for future release".

instagram-luceo-04

From the Luceo group project, Few & Far Between: stills documenting the trip. Drive-through Gentlemen's Club, New Alexandria, Pennsylvania. Image courtesy of Luceo Images

Not everyone is convinced, though. "What concerns me is that this is yet another channel for creating and disseminating photography that does not bring in income. At least not yet," says Kashi. "I gather ‘building your brand' is all the rage and while I acknowledge the importance of that, it's not why I create nor do I see a direct correlation to making a living and developing this field into the digital era where creators' work is respected, compensated and properly appreciated."

Kashi wonders whether Instagram is yet another fad that "further feeds the devaluation of our craft and continues to contribute to the destruction of this field as a viable way to make a living". His concerns come on the heels of the release of his Photojournalisms iPad app, which failed to gain interest from users. "I am willing to explore these new models of distribution, but it's a crap shoot and requires a lot of trial and error. We're also facing the audience's expectation of not having to pay for content. I don't mean to be negative, but it's a slog. I guess this all makes me feel like asking, 'so this is what it's come to?'"

ed-kashi-02

A giant mound of sugar in the Cupersucor warehouse in Santos, Brazil, October 2011 © Ed Kashi

Another concern is that of privacy. Gillian Laub, who has been using Instagram since December 2011, is reticent to share images from her shoots. "I don't use the app for professional purposes," she tells BJP by email. "In fact, I am very careful not to post photos on a shoot because there are privacy and publication issues." And that policy also applies to Laub's assistants, who are also banned from sharing behind-the-scenes images, especially if they include geographical information. "Just recently a photo assistant posted a photograph on Instagram from a shoot we were on. We were at a famous person's home. He has quite a following and I really didn't feel comfortable having him post an image of it. Even though we have entered this crazy world of social media and transparency, I believe there still must be some boundaries and respect for people's privacy. We must use good judgement. It's a good thing I follow him and saw the image, and I had him take it off Instagram right away." As a result, Laub uses Instagram for personal purposes, sharing images with friends and family members, especially since, she says, she has yet to meet a client who has asked her to contribute to an Instagram feed.

Yet Instagram continues to gather momentum in the industry. Following National Geographic's lead, The New Yorker recently started to commission photographers to take over its feed of images – Kashi and Benjamin Lowy being the most recent ones.

"We're communicators by nature," say Peveto and Slaby, "and things like Instagram offer us a new language to speak with. Like words on paper, the real question still comes down to whether or not what you're saying has intrinsic value to others beyond just making a casual observation. Does the image help sell something? Is it culturally relevant and significant? Is it curated close enough that there is entertainment value in watching a particular feed? These questions are the starting point to trying to monetise any content production. We're positively aware of them, and experimenting within those boundaries."

instagram-luceo-03

Church Loading, near Bloomingrose, West Virginia. Image courtesy of Luceo Images

And, as Stanmeyer adds, Instagram, in the end, has allowed him to reach hundreds of thousands of people. "Decades ago, I often thought of how brilliant it would be to publish photographs on roadside billboards to scream what mattered to me – until I discovered how expensive these spaces cost. Instagram and other social media does just that: reaching the potential consciousness of hundreds of thousands, and even more." But, he admits, the implications can be daunting, because "we're still in the infancy of where this road we are paving is taking us. But is it exciting and does it hold limitless potential? Yes."

 

To follow on Instagram the photographers interviewed for this article, search for the following handles: John Stanmeyer - @johnstanmeyer; Ed Kashi - @edkashi; Marcus Bleasdale - @marcusbleasdale; John Vink - @johnvink; Sean Gallagher - @sean_gallagher_photo; David Walter Banks - @davidwalterbanks; Kendrick Brinson - @kendrickbrinson; Matt Eich - @matteich; Matt Slaby - @mattslaby; Daryl Peveto - @dpeveto; James Estrin - @jamesestrin; and Gillian Laub - @gigilaub. The author of this article, Olivier Laurent, can be followed @olivierclaurent.

This article is the first in a series of features looking at the new economics of the photojournalism market. In the coming days, as photojournalists gather in Perpignan for the Visa pour l'Image festival, we will discuss the successes, and at times failures, photographers are encountering in a quest to find new revenue streams.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

the good the bad and the ugly

I love instagram and use it everyday. But a filter on a bad image is still bad.
No filter on a good image is still good. Subject matter is not the problem. It's possible to make good self portraits or bad ones. Same goes for food, pets, sunsets, and feet. Let's not use instagram as a photo garbage dump. Fast, fun, and fluid, instagram lets us edit and publish our own magazines and portfolios throughout the day. Don't obsess on follows and likes. It's the images that matter.
@jmmantel

Posted by: John Marshall Mantel on 03 Sep 2012 at 13:43

Instagram filter app or sociual media

Thanks for this excelent post.

I do use Instagram a lot. I am not a professional photographer, (sadly I do not live the dream), but I love photography.

Instagram I use it as an everyday life journal, mostly when I do not have my camera with me. So as Chase Jarvis says The best camera is the one you have with you. So, iPhoneography has been a good way for me to communicate.

I use Instagram mainly as a social network, to filter I use other app which I think has better filter options, more control of it. Snapseed.

Yes as Mr. Kashi says, Instragram is a brand maker for the most of aspiring photographers.

I do bought Kashi's Photojournalisms app and it is amazing.

There is a lot to see from all the social media, it is starting and it has been overwhelming.

Me: @g281

Posted by: Gustavo Mondragon on 03 Sep 2012 at 15:05

Style of substance?

It seems to me (a non user) that the whole thing with Instagram, according to this article, is that it is a good platform to share images. I am perfectly fine with that. However, my worry is that people seem to want to take credit for the way the images look, when in fact they had no say how the image turned out at all. Its nothing more than a mathematical programme adding the 'effect'. As mentioned by @jimmantel 'but a filter on a bad image is still bad'. Yet we are bombarded with imagery now a days and I honestly believe that the standard of photography is declining due to the fact that we just don't see enough high end photography as we cant see them through the clutter of averageness. Instagram doesn't make you a good photographer and people honestly think that it does.

"As long as you don't have control over the image, I don't believe it has any value," Jean-François Leroy, Visa Pour l'Image photo festival

Posted by: @tobijenkins on 03 Sep 2012 at 15:57

The new photojournalism

Reading this it stikes me that Matt Eich is the only ones who is taking the medium seriously, sharing images that are made possible by the intimate and personal nature of the device. He is also opening up a dialogue with the Instagram community about these images. A legit two-way process rather than a ooh, lots of people here, gotta jump on approach.

Can help but feel that a few others are still apologising for being there, which is reflected in their limited engagement and poor photo quality compared to their professional sites and work.

Ed Kashi is right, there is no way to monetise an Instagram feed because the numbers work against you. You're one of 80 million who are on the site, of which many thousands can tell a good story, a relevant local story.

This may be inflammatory, but I'm struggling to see how photojournalists can retain their relevance on Instagram. The casual Instagramer will always beat them to a story, as happened last week with the NY shooting. This is the future of photojournalism - realtime, free and unfiltered by editors.

Oh and if you're interested in good Instagram reportage then follow @nampix @_meanwhile @mickpix @oggsie @iphoneographic and all the others who are pushing the mobile photography forward.

Oh and for those blinded by the filters, If you look past them you will see the extraordinary revolution that is happening in photo presentation and consumption. Here's an article I wrote about it: http://mobilephotogroup.com/blog/opinion/its-not-about-the-filters-context-photojournalism-and-instagram/

Posted by: Misho Baranovic on 03 Sep 2012 at 16:10

Why doesn't BJP support good photography?

I don't get the point of this article BJP.

These amazing photographers are ALL filtering their images, which was considered a faux pas up until someone realised that a photo will stand on its merits regardless of the editing. The problem is that we're still seeing too many good pictures rather than good photography shared on Instagram, and articles like this one don't help.

There's still a failure to contextualise the images in many of the streams I see on Instagram. The "visual diary" or scrap-booking use of Instagram produces images where content and composition may be good, but there's no text, or context for the image to make sense in the narrative of images shared. It's lazy, and understandably so - this article has included several world renown photographers who don't need to contextualise their work, or even think about a body of work being shared on Instagram as they already have existing photography community that they are a part of regardless of Instagram connections.

But the opposite is the case for most users of Instagram, and this is why focussing on the use of the app by existing photo journalists is therefore going to result in an article that misses several opportunities to explore quality photography that is already being shared on Instagram.

I think this is crucial because people will read articles like this one and assume that it is an authority on the use and purpose of Instagram. They'll not see it from the point of view of photographers who are dedicated to producing quality (often un-filtered) work specifically for consumption on Instagram on a mobile device.

If such publication as BJP instead highlighted specific uses of Instagram by less notable photographers that were considered excellent in regards to the content, composition and context it would help increase an understanding that the use of the service isn't simply limited to the casual scrap booking of behind the scenes moments. It would highlight that there is a greater potential for the creation and sharing of quality photographic work from a mobile phone, for consumption on a mobile phone.

This is a problem because people are looking for examples of good photography on Instagram, not simply another good picture. Good photography has content, composition and context. A good picture usually has good content and composition, but most often lack the context that really creates the point of communication with an audience.

This BJP article hasn't looked at Instagram from the point of view of the audience there, and is poorer for it.

I think that there are many photographers out there that are already sharing good photography on Instagram and I am looking forward to seeing their work highlighted rather than simply another article about how the existing photographers are exploring the app.

This article makes me ask the question: Why doesn't BJP support good photography?

Posted by: Oliver Lang on 03 Sep 2012 at 16:20

BJP

"Why doesn't BJP support good photography?"

I invite you, Oliver, to pick-up a copy of BJP before asking this question.

But to answer your post, this is not an article about Instagram, this is an article about photojournalists and Instagram. How the app is being used by photojournalists in their workflow and in their career.

I agree with you, there's a lot more to write about Instagram (especially, as you say, about the contextualisation of images) - but not everything can be discussed in one, single article.

Talking about context, some of the photographers mentioned in this article do provide a lot of context to their images. Especially when they are working for NatGeo, for example.

Posted by: Olivier Laurent on 03 Sep 2012 at 17:40

To clarify the original question:

Hi Olivier,

Thank you for your response. I’d like to clarify the question I posed in my original comment.

I know that BJP does have a long history of supporting photography; however, I haven't seen this support extend to the images shared on Instagram.

I understand the context of the article, apologies if I've made to bold a step with the response, particularly the title. It certainly wasn't a general assessment of the BJP, it was a question directed at the nature of this article. Essentially, I was asking why is this not an article which identifies and discusses the best photographic work shared from this platform?

Of course I understand that a single article cannot contain all relevant or worthy information. However, the impact this article has is worth noting. I’ve seen responses elsewhere to the above article that assume that as the photographers of the quality mentioned here are not taking it seriously, that it is safe to assume there is no further discussion on the subject. They conclude that Instagram has nothing more to offer.

I believe that photography as a whole has so much to gain from a better understanding of the potential for mobile photography. I would love to see publications such as the BJP explore this area rather than simply applying it to existing workflows and established photographers and brands.

It’s worth noting that the NatGeo Instagram feed (much like the New Yorker account) IS a better provider of context than it once was - but lessons were learned the hard way, even by Ed Kashi whose image was poorly received by people following the NatGeo account, which prompted Ed to remove his image and write about his experience here: http://edkashi.com/blog/professional-journalists-and-instagrams/

Misho Baranovic clarified the issue with the following article, which also addressed other NatGeo images which lacked context:

" Instagram users pick who they want to follow, and in this case, I hazard to guess, followed @natgeo expecting Nat Geo-quality images. For the most part, that is what’s being shared on the account—monkeys and mountains, some with filters, some without—but they all fit with users’ expectations. Ed’s image was outside this range. It was a personal, candid moment, and people couldn’t place it so they rejected it."
(source: http://mobilephotogroup.com/blog/opinion/its-not-about-the-filters-context-photojournalism-and-instagram/)
I really appreciate the response, and I look forward to future discussions regarding the use of Instagram.

Posted by: Oliver Lang on 03 Sep 2012 at 19:15

It's more fun on instagram!

This is the reason why people loves instagram because they like photo sharing and they like editing pictures that can enhance on what the message is all about on that pictures. If you want to have more followers on instagram you can check instagramfollowerhub . COM now. It's very quick and easy!

Posted by: Sheila Lenhardt on 04 Sep 2012 at 05:28

Unbeliveable!

The main photo at the top of this article is taken with Hipstamatic - Not instagram

Posted by: Cookiepus on 04 Sep 2012 at 10:32

believable

@cookiepus - the latest version of Hipstamatic has an instagram plugin so that users can capture and process their images on Hipstamatic, and then publish/share them via Instagram.

Posted by: @benrobertsphoto on 04 Sep 2012 at 16:13

4 articles related to this subject

Here:

http://www.thevisualexperience.org/web/tag/photography-after-photography/

Posted by: @visexp on 04 Sep 2012 at 22:41

Instagram

Instagram has a wonderful look and feel but I agree completely that a bad shot is still bad even with a filter.
I think with digital photography, as it's become so clean and almost sterile looking with the amazing advances in digital technology people have taken to Instagram, because of the implied nostalgia. I see this for the rise of 'imperfection' in photography.
In 'real' PJ photographers are not meant to manipulate their imagery at all, so the use of instagram's adhoc filter applications relieves this dilemma as what is applied is out of the photographers control and the result completely random.
Having said all that, I'm not sure presenting today's PJ images in a form that looks like something Lewis Hine captured is representative of our place in history, so for me even though may of the images look pretty, I'm not sure it should be considered true PJ

Posted by: Hilary WARDHAUGH on 04 Sep 2012 at 23:39

Are we jealous?

first of all please excuse my english as it is not my native language...,

I still don't know what I think of Instagram, after all it is just a tool. nothing more than the costless version of hipster toys such as the holga or other crapy toy camera. At the end are those image any good? of course ! do they mean something? sometime ! but does any of those so called photojournalist could even load a roll of film in a 24x36? probably no, but who care? Andy Warhol shot almost all is famous picture on a SX70 Polaroid.
Lets face it it is useless to fight against that. If I can make the same living taking pictures with a iPhone in my pocket instead of carrying around 50k€ of equipment, I'm fine with that ... I know that I'm able to shoot real pictures on my Hassy on a roll of velvia if I want... and that my friends is the only thing that really matter to me , and surely something that is going to be very valuable in a few year...

Posted by: Christian Van Hanja on 05 Sep 2012 at 18:55

Not Entirely Instagram

I think it's worth noting that some of the frames (and probably filters) used on some of these photos are from Pixlr-o-Matic by Autodesk, not entirely from Instagram itself.

Posted by: James Shanahben on 05 Sep 2012 at 19:10

We all like whatever we like

If I take a photo, it's because I think it's a nice or captivating image. I really don't care that there are hundreds of thousands of 'amateur' snappers thinking the photo of them blowing smoke with a wad of notes hanging out of their baggy jeans is cool ('the standard of photography is declining'); the whole thing with Instagram is that we CAN all take photos, great or not, & share them with the world, or no-one! Nobody forces you to do it, goodness - some people make it sound like hard work! Chill out!

Posted by: Laura Price on 05 Sep 2012 at 19:36

it's obvious...

why people love this app - it makes boring pictures look cool - and there is nothing wrong with that -

Posted by: david on 10 Sep 2012 at 12:29

It is what it is.

Instagram isn't 'shaping the world of photography' it's just a fun social media tool.

We use it for our behind the scenes shots too but I wouldn't take it seriously as an art form or 'style' of photography.

I'm surprised actually that so many photographers are happy to jump on the 'Instagram wagon' and make their images look the same as all the other photographers using Instragram.

It is what it is.

Posted by: Lisa Pritchard on 14 Sep 2012 at 11:25

Crap

The only problem with instagram, is that it makes people think that filtering images to look vintage is cool, sad really. In a day and age where technology, and emulsions, are better than ever, the choice of the masses, and apparently sadly enough by pro's too now (according to this article), is to jam good pictures with crap software filters.

Posted by: John on 29 Sep 2012 at 10:43

print

If i want to print a instagram image on a 18x24 format paper, what should i do? Nothing.

Posted by: Octavian on 03 Oct 2012 at 13:18

monetizing en route

getty images sells instagram and other filter related mobilephone images as a part of their collection. instagram feeds a different venue than this, but i think the greater idea to be appreciated is that the industry at large is taking notice of the creative value of this type of photography. and lest we think it is depleting the value of our work as professional photographers, it should be noted that acceptance into these new collections comes at a high level of technical and aesthetic professionalism.

Posted by: pholange on 24 Oct 2012 at 06:58

Updating your subscription status Loading