Light of the night: testing Leica's Noctilux-M f/0.95 lens

leica-noctilux-m-50mm-front

The ultra-fast aperture of the Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH is only half the story, says Edmond Terakopian, when he takes this record-breaking aspherical lens out on assignment.

Author: Edmond Terakopian

No-one appreciates the value of a 50mm prime lens better than a Leica M user. The camera maker has four to choose from that are anything but standard, including the f/2.5 Summarit, the f/2 Summicron and the f/1.4 Summilux, along with the lens it dubbed “king of the night” when it was unveiled three years ago, the Noctilux f/0.95, which comes with an eye-watering price tag of £7348 +VAT.

Along with the 35mm wide-angle, 50mm is the classic rangefinder focal length, so it comes as no surprise to find this many standard primes available. Apart from the pure light gathering properties of them, each adds a unique signature to the image it creates, and none more so than Leica’s Noctilux range. Meaning “light of the night”, the series began in 1966 with an f/1.2 version designed by Helmut Marx. A new design by Dr Walter Mandler in 1976 pushed the aperture to an astonishing f/1 and, along with redesigns of the lens body resulting in four versions, it continued until it was replaced in 2008 by the current f/0.95 Aspherical Noctilux designed by Peter Karbe.

According to Stefan Daniel, Leica’s director for product management, “The Noctilux 0.95/50 is one of the most demanding lenses currently in production, and we can only assign production and assembly to the most experienced and skilled people in the whole company”. It is also the most expensive lens in the M and S ranges. It may therefore come as a bit of a surprise to learn that it’s also one of the most in-demand lenses, with a waiting list of up to a year. Although the lens itself takes 16 hours to assemble by hand, it’s the raw materials and optics, some of which have a rumoured 12-month period to cool from being cast, which add to the length of time required. There is some very exotic glass used in this lens.

You can pick up one of the older f/1 versions immediately on the second-hand market for between £3000 and £5000 depending on the version and condition. But although the f/1 versions are fast and will allow similar use in low light, all but the current f/0.95 version have a smooth, soft and “glowy” signature look when shot wide open. It’s a beautiful look that works extremely well for certain types of portrait and still life, but it’s not suitable for everything. This limits its use as an everyday lens and makes it a special use lens, meaning you need a standard 50mm as well. The same is definitely not true of the current f/0.95 ASPH Noctilux, which not only allows photography in even lower light, but does so with such pin-sharp precision that it makes the lens suitable for everything.

street-leica-m9-20110303-072

The narrow depth of field at f/0.95 meant that this sculpture could be isolated from the background - even when it was impossible to move back any further. Image © Edmond Terakopian.

In the days of shooting film, the f/1 Noctilux opened up possibilities with shooting in low light that would have been impossible, even with an f/1.4 lens. However, in the days of digital, this isn’t that big a problem as you can, up to a limit, just push up the ISO. There is more to choosing a Noctilux though, and I would suggest that more people choose it nowadays for its signature look than they do purely for its speed in low-light photography.

Apart from its cost, another aspect that sets it apart from the other Leica M 50mm lenses is its size. The Leica shooter is generally used to tiny lenses. However, to any SLR shooter, the f/0.95 can actually seem small compared to their f/2.8 zooms, and compares favourably in size to Canon’s 50mm f/1.2L lens, currently the fastest 50mm lens available for the SLR market.

On assignment

Along with my M9 and 21mm, 35mm and 90mm M lenses, I took the Noctilux on a four-day assignment to Glasgow. It turned out to be my favourite lens to work with by far and, apart from three occasions, I realised I had shot the entire assignment on it. I must say, the results looked rather special.

It takes a short while to get used to its size on an M camera. It’s so well made though, with such a beautifully buttery focus movement, that it just comes to hand very quickly indeed.

One thing that surprised me from very early on was how little light I needed to make pictures. I was constantly taking down the ISO and, in other situations where I thought I needed a flash, I kept realising that the available light was more than enough.

I have worked extensively with the 50mm Summicron and 50mm Elmarit-M f/2.8, which are both amazing lenses with great image rendition. However, nothing I have shot with, including Leica’s discontinued 75mm Summilux f/1.4 or Canon’s 85mm f/1.2L II, produces images like the Noctilux. The images just pop. Your point of focus is pin-sharp and rendered perfectly. Shot wide open, the background blur is phenomenal and absolutely unique. Even Zeiss, which is known for its background rendition, can’t come close to how this lens renders.

royal-wedding-party-040

This image was taken in low light with the main source of light coming from behind the subjects and an aperture of f/0.95. "The Noctilux allowed the shot to happen," says Edmond Terakopian. Image © Edmond Terakopian.

It’s not all roses though. This lens is challenging to work with at f/0.95. The depth-of-field is practically non-existent, and you have to be absolutely spot on with focus. It’s therefore a good idea to send your Leica rangefinder back to Solms with your Noctilux to have them calibrated to match perfectly. Leica products are very accurately calibrated to within tiny tolerance margins; however, when shooting at f/0.95, all it takes is for the camera to be plus in the tolerance range and for the lens to be minus and the image is slightly out of focus. This is an absolute must as, otherwise, you might just give up on the lens, judging it too challenging to work with, which would be a big mistake, as the magic of the lens will then remain undiscovered.

Also, when at f/0.95, strongly backlit subjects do sometimes suffer from purple fringing and, in these situations, it’s best to stop down a little.

Conclusions

The Leica rangefinder has always been a favourite with photographers who like to work with available light, and the lack of a reflex mirror means that it’s much easier to handhold at slower shutter speeds. With this in mind, and the fact that the f/0.95 is by far the fastest lens currently available on the market for any full-frame camera, this is a lens to truly covet. It creates beautiful images with an amazingly soft and fluid bokeh that makes your subject pop. And it gives more dimension and depth to every picture – some even describe it as a three-dimensional quality.

Is it worth the asking price? It’s hard to ignore the fact that you could buy an M9 and a 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH for a fraction more, not to mention the DSLR kit you could get for the same price. However, in a world where everyone shoots with the same equipment, with a sea of 24-70mm zooms, the Leica M9 and any Leica lens will set your work apart. The Noctilux takes this much further. It’s good to be an individual...

Visit uk.leica-camera.com.

  • Comment
  • Print
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn

Comments

Leica M9 +.95

The M9 and F.95 will only set YOUR work apart as the article says, if YOU make a good photograph.
As an M user I still feel that the camera is becoming the Faberge Egg of cameras.
The spec of the M( and quality of High ISO is mediocre, you even have to pay more for dioptre correction.
Great images are being made with cameras of all types from an Holga upwards I feel the statement
that about setting your work apart just ads to the myth and lusting whilst totally inaccurate.
David

Posted by: David on 20 Jul 2011 at 16:27

"Primes"?

You of all people should know that these lenses are only then "primes" if and when supplementary lenses are added to them.

Posted by: -- on 20 Jul 2011 at 16:35

Leica .95 Noctilux

Thanks for the frank review, Edmond, especially the tip about sending the camera and lens in for calibration.

Posted by: bob soltys on 20 Jul 2011 at 22:23

"review"

Sprinkling a reiteration of what people at Leica tell you, and then sprinkling it with such technical optical terms as "buttery", "bokeh", and "pop" hardly constitutes a review in my eyes. There is not one piece of objective performance measuring. I can hear Geoffrey Crawley turning in his grave.

Posted by: Nigel Cheffers-Heard on 20 Jul 2011 at 22:34

Thanks!

You cut to the heart of the matter. This lens is about emotion and artistry. To try and catch it in test-bed results would be nonsense, it is about the way it renders in the hands of the photographer.

Posted by: Jaapv on 21 Jul 2011 at 08:32

Nocti .95

I second jaapv's comment. This one is on my M9 most of the time. I haven't tried it on my MP yet.

Posted by: AB on 23 Jul 2011 at 05:31

is the summilux better?

According to Lloyd Chambers: "...the Summilux stands head and shoulders above the Noctilux in terms of contrast and sharpness at f/1.4 and f/2. At f/2.8 onwards, field curvature and tiny focus differences determine which lens performs better in any particular area of the frame." So unless you only use the Noctilux wide open, you`re better buying the Summilux

Posted by: andy on 16 Nov 2011 at 11:27

Fantastic, but......

Apparently the 50 lux performs better from f1.4 - 2.8, which would leave me using the noctilux at .95 only. The out-of-focus is dreamy to say the least!!!
I can imagine this lens would be great fun for a couple of months, but I`d begin to miss having high contrast and sharpness wide open, so the I`d need the lux, too!

I`m saving for the 50 lux, and hopefully someone will produce a full-frame non-leica body I can mount it on. My poor eyesight would make accurate focussing hit and miss with an m9

Posted by: andy on 20 Jan 2012 at 19:25

Believe the hype

This lens may as well be welded to my M9. I rarely take it off. I don't own a 50 summilux but can certainly vouch for it's performance wide open AND stopped down. It's the single best lens I've ever owned and one of the reasons I bought into the Leica system.

To me it's entirely unbeatable.

Posted by: Dan on 22 Feb 2012 at 22:19

talent, not equipment, sets your work apart

If you have talent, you wont need such a lens to demonstrate it

Posted by: andy on 06 Apr 2012 at 20:23

Noctilux 0.95 view?

No one word about "blocked" viewfinder! i always lusted after the 90mm Summicron f2, the original one. The Noctilux is bigger, fatter and larger in every way.The 90mmblocked most of the frame. How do you see with the lens. A lens that has special qualities in it's drawing deserves a screen and really a DSLR or SLR. Let's face it, the CRF is no longer relevant! i do own a LM system.

Posted by: jason gold on 03 Jul 2012 at 03:02

Updating your subscription status Loading